University of Missouri, USA; Missouri Prevention Science Institute, USA.
University of Missouri, USA; Missouri Prevention Science Institute, USA.
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Aug;105:101317. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101317. Epub 2024 May 9.
Scholars have developed culturally responsive frameworks and interventions to support educators as they aim to create inclusive and equitable classroom environments. Despite the number of frameworks on the topic, research on culturally responsive practices (CRPs) is limited by the lack of clear definitions or evidence on the effectiveness of in-classroom culturally responsive interventions. With the aim to understand which characteristics are important for in-classroom CRPs, this qualitative study explored students' perceptions of practices teachers use to respond to students' learning and cultural identities. We conducted 23 focus groups with 103 Black, Latine, and White students in middle and high school from two midwestern schools. After analyzing the data, we identified four overarching themes: (a) inclusive classroom instruction, (b) emotional safety in the classroom, (c) relational quality with the teachers, and (d) racism and other "isms" in the classroom. Students consistently commented on the importance of teacher support for students' emotional and academic well-being while also describing teachers that demeaned them or their peers, in turn, obstructing their learning. The findings hold promise to clarify and strengthen professional development CRP interventions as students offer insight about teacher cultural responsiveness and non-responsiveness.
学者们已经开发出文化响应框架和干预措施,以支持教育工作者努力创建包容和平等的课堂环境。尽管有许多关于这个主题的框架,但关于文化响应实践(CRPs)的研究受到缺乏明确定义或关于课堂文化响应干预有效性的证据的限制。为了了解课堂文化响应实践的哪些特征很重要,这项定性研究探讨了学生对教师用来回应学生学习和文化身份的实践的看法。我们在两所中西部学校对 103 名黑人和拉丁裔以及白人的中学生进行了 23 次焦点小组讨论。在分析数据后,我们确定了四个总体主题:(a)包容的课堂教学,(b)课堂中的情感安全,(c)与教师的关系质量,以及(d)课堂中的种族主义和其他“主义”。学生们一直强调教师支持学生的情感和学业福祉的重要性,同时也描述了那些贬低他们或他们的同学的教师,从而阻碍了他们的学习。这些发现有望澄清和加强专业发展 CRP 干预措施,因为学生提供了关于教师文化响应性和非响应性的深刻见解。