低负荷血流限制训练对健康成年人肌腱的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of low-load blood flow restriction training in healthy adult tendons: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Blanquerna School of Health Sciences - Ramon Llull University, c/ Padilla, 326, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

Neuroscience Lab (part of IDIBAPS, Barcelona), Calle Marina 312 3-4, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jul;39:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.048. Epub 2023 Dec 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the effects of low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFR) on healthy adult tendons.

DESIGN

A systematic review with meta-analysis.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Six electronic databases were searched by two researchers.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

Clinical trials comparing the effects of LL-BFR to high-load resistance training (HL-RT) or low-load resistance training (LL-RT) in healthy adult tendons.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers selected the eligible clinical trials, and one reviewer exported the data. Two reviewers evaluated the study quality and risk of bias using the PEDro scale and the ROB2 scale. We performed meta-analysis where appropriate using a random-effects model. We rated the quality of evidence using GRADE.

RESULTS

Six studies were eligible. We analyzed tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) and tendon stiffness as the outcomes. Across all comparisons, there was low-to moderate-quality evidence of a difference between LL-BFR and LL-RT immediately after exercise. There was high-quality evidence of no difference between LL-BFR and HL-RT in the long term.

CONCLUSION

The effects of LL-BFR on the tendons depends on the time and dose of the intervention. LL-BFR could be useful to increase the CSA of the tendons in a similar or superior way to HL-RT after 8 weeks of intervention.

摘要

目的

系统评价低负荷血流限制训练(LL-BFR)对健康成人肌腱的影响。

设计

系统评价与荟萃分析。

文献检索

两位研究人员在 6 个电子数据库中进行了检索。

研究选择标准

比较 LL-BFR 与高负荷抗阻训练(HL-RT)或低负荷抗阻训练(LL-RT)对健康成人肌腱影响的临床试验。

数据综合

两位评审员选择了合格的临床试验,一位评审员导出数据。两位评审员使用 PEDro 量表和 ROB2 量表评估研究质量和偏倚风险。我们在适当的情况下使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。

结果

6 项研究符合条件。我们分析了肌腱横截面积(CSA)和肌腱硬度作为结局。所有比较中,运动后即刻,LL-BFR 与 LL-RT 之间存在低到中度质量证据的差异。长期来看,LL-BFR 与 HL-RT 之间没有差异,证据质量高。

结论

LL-BFR 对肌腱的影响取决于干预的时间和剂量。在 8 周的干预后,LL-BFR 可以以类似于或优于 HL-RT 的方式增加肌腱 CSA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索