Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Brazil.
Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná (UENP), Brazil.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Jul;39:615-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
Pilates exercises have been used by the older adults and have shown potential to improve some components of physical fitness.
To verify the effects of Pilates on strength, endurance and muscle power in older adults.
The searches were performed in the databases: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, LILACS and PEDro until September 2022, without filters that limited the date of publications or language. The studies included were: randomized clinical trials (RCTs); interventions that used Pilates; interventions with outcomes involving strength, endurance and/or muscle power; participants over 60 years old.
24 RCTs (1190 participants) were selected. There is low quality evidence that Pilates did not significantly improve muscle strength compared to the control group (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = 1.18 [95%CI -0.71, 3.08] I = 93%), and moderate quality compared to other exercises (SMD = 0.01 [CI95% -0.46, 0.48] I = 0%). Very low quality evidence shows that Pilates can improve muscular endurance of upper limbs compared to control group (Mean Difference (MD) = 4.87 [95%CI 2.38, 7.36] I = 88%) and lower limbs compared to other exercises (MD = 2.68 [CI95% 0.26, 5.10] I = 87%). It was not possible to perform muscle power analysis due to the reduced number of studies.
Currently, it is not feasible to recommend Pilates exercises as a means to improve strength, endurance and muscle power in the older adults. More RCTs covering this topic are needed given the low quality of evidence available at this time.
普拉提练习已被老年人使用,并显示出改善某些身体适应性的潜力。
验证普拉提对老年人力量、耐力和肌肉力量的影响。
在 2022 年 9 月之前,在数据库 PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、LILACS 和 PEDro 中进行了搜索,没有限制出版物日期或语言的过滤器。纳入的研究为:随机临床试验(RCT);使用普拉提的干预措施;干预措施的结果涉及力量、耐力和/或肌肉力量;参与者年龄在 60 岁以上。
共纳入 24 项 RCT(1190 名参与者)。有低质量证据表明,与对照组相比,普拉提并没有显著提高肌肉力量(标准化均数差(SMD)=1.18 [95%CI-0.71, 3.08] I²=93%),与其他运动相比,证据质量中等(SMD=0.01 [95%CI-0.46, 0.48] I²=0%)。极低质量证据表明,与对照组相比,普拉提可以提高上肢肌肉耐力(平均差(MD)=4.87 [95%CI 2.38, 7.36] I²=88%)和下肢肌肉耐力(与其他运动相比,MD=2.68 [95%CI 0.26, 5.10] I²=87%)。由于研究数量较少,无法进行肌肉力量分析。
目前,不建议将普拉提运动作为提高老年人力量、耐力和肌肉力量的方法。鉴于目前可用证据质量较低,需要更多的 RCT 来涵盖这个主题。