Suppr超能文献

一种等长大腿中部拉伸方案评估峰值力量和力量耐力的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of a single isometric mid-thigh pull protocol to assess peak force and strength-endurance.

机构信息

School of Sport, Health, and Social Sciences, Solent University, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Therapeutics, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Aug 23;12:e17951. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17951. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of strength-endurance protocols using isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Twenty-eight participants (23.2 ± 4.9 years) completed two protocols across four testing sessions. Protocol one consisted of 10 maximal IMTP tests lasting 5 seconds each with 10 seconds rest between. Protocol two consisted of a prolonged 60 second maximal IMTP. Data from protocol 1 was analysed in two ways; (a) use of the highest peak value from the first three IMTP efforts, and the lowest peak value from the final three IMTP efforts, and (b) use of the mean peak force from the first three IMTP efforts and mean peak force from the final three IMTP efforts. Data from protocol two used the highest and lowest peak values in the first- and final-15 seconds. Analyses revealed excellent reliability for peak force across all four testing sessions (ICC = 0.94), as well as good test-retest reliability for strength-endurance for protocol 1 (a; ICC = 0.81, b; ICC = 0.79). Test-retest reliability for protocol 2 was poor (ICC = 0.305). Bland-Altman bias values were smaller for protocol 1(a = -8.8 Nm, b = 21.7 Nm) compared to protocol 2 = (119.3 Nm). Our data suggest that 10 maximal IMTP tests performed as described herein is a reliable method for exercise professionals to assess both peak force and strength-endurance in a single, time-efficient protocol.

摘要

本研究旨在检验使用等长大腿中部拉伸(IMTP)的力量耐力测试的重测信度。28 名参与者(23.2±4.9 岁)在四次测试中完成了两个方案。方案一由 10 次最大 IMTP 测试组成,每次持续 5 秒,每次之间休息 10 秒。方案二由持续 60 秒的最大 IMTP 组成。方案 1 的数据以两种方式进行分析;(a)使用前三个 IMTP 中的最高峰值和最后三个 IMTP 中的最低峰值,以及(b)使用前三个 IMTP 的平均峰值力和最后三个 IMTP 的平均峰值力。方案 2 使用前 15 秒和最后 15 秒的最高和最低峰值。分析表明,在所有四个测试中,峰值力的可靠性都非常高(ICC = 0.94),并且方案 1 的力量耐力重测信度也很好(a:ICC = 0.81,b:ICC = 0.79)。方案 2 的重测信度较差(ICC = 0.305)。方案 1(a = -8.8 Nm,b = 21.7 Nm)的 Bland-Altman 偏倚值明显小于方案 2(119.3 Nm)。我们的数据表明,10 次最大 IMTP 测试按本文所述进行,是一种可靠的方法,可在单次、高效的方案中评估峰值力和力量耐力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ae3/11348909/f426dd9c70ae/peerj-12-17951-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验