• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放与微创肾输尿管切除术:来自广泛全国人群数据库的当代分析。

Open versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy: Contemporary Analysis from a Wide National Population-Based Database.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7212-7219. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15565-6. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15565-6
PMID:38879671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is generally perceived that minimally invasive nephroureterectomy (MINU), especially in the form of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, is gaining an increasing role in many institutions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate contemporary trends in the adoption of MINU in the United States compared with open nephroureterectomy (ONU).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ONU or MINU between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed using PearlDiver Mariner, an all-payer insurance claims database. International Classification of Diseases diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the type of surgical procedure, patients' characteristics, social determinants of health (SDOH), and perioperative complications. The primary objective assessed different trends and costs in NU adoption, while secondary objectives analyzed factors influencing the postoperative complications, including SDOH. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 15,240 patients underwent ONU (n = 7675) and MINU (n = 7565). Utilization of ONU declined over the study period, whereas that of MINU increased from 29 to 72% (p = 0.01). The 60-day postoperative complication rate was 23% for ONU and 19% for MINU (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, ONU showed a significantly higher risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.48). Approximately 5% and 9% of patients reported at least one SDOH at baseline for both ONU and MINU (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary trend analysis of a large national dataset confirms that there has been a significant shift towards MINU, which is gradually replacing ONU. A minimally invasive approach is associated with lower risk of complications. SDOH are non-clinical factors that currently do not have an impact on the outcomes of nephroureterectomy.

摘要

背景

微创肾输尿管切除术(MINU),特别是机器人辅助腹腔镜手术,在许多机构中的应用越来越广泛,这是普遍公认的。

目的

我们的研究旨在调查与开放肾输尿管切除术(ONU)相比,MINU 在美国的应用的当代趋势。

方法

使用 PearlDiverMariner(一种全支付者保险索赔数据库)对 2011 年至 2021 年间接受 ONU 或 MINU 的患者进行回顾性分析。国际疾病分类诊断和手术代码用于识别手术类型、患者特征、社会决定因素(SDOH)和围手术期并发症。主要目的评估了 NU 采用的不同趋势和成本,次要目的分析了影响术后并发症的因素,包括 SDOH。使用多变量回归模型比较结果。

结果

总体而言,有 15240 名患者接受了 ONU(n=7675)和 MINU(n=7565)治疗。研究期间,ONU 的使用率下降,而 MINU 的使用率从 29%上升到 72%(p=0.01)。ONU 的 60 天术后并发症发生率为 23%,MINU 为 19%(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,ONU 显示术后并发症的风险显著更高(比值比 1.33,95%置信区间 1.20-1.48)。大约 5%和 9%的接受 ONU 和 MINU 治疗的患者在基线时有至少一个 SDOH(p<0.001)。

结论

对大型国家数据集的当代趋势分析证实,MINU 的应用已显著转移,逐渐取代了 ONU。微创方法与较低的并发症风险相关。SDOH 是非临床因素,目前对肾输尿管切除术的结果没有影响。

相似文献

1
Open versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy: Contemporary Analysis from a Wide National Population-Based Database.开放与微创肾输尿管切除术:来自广泛全国人群数据库的当代分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7212-7219. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15565-6. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
2
A Comparison of 30-Day Perioperative Outcomes in Open Versus Minimally Invasive Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of 896 Patients from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.开放性与微创性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的30天围手术期结果比较:来自美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划数据库的896例患者分析
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1052-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0137. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Perioperative outcomes and complication predictors associated with open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy.开放性与微创性肾输尿管切除术的围手术期结局及并发症预测因素
Can J Urol. 2018 Aug;25(4):9395-9400.
4
Robotic versus other nephroureterectomy techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 87,000 cases.机器人与其他肾输尿管切除术技术的比较:超过 87000 例病例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03020-1. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
5
Open versus Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: Trends and Outcomes from a Wide National Population-Based Database.开放性与微创性部分肾切除术:基于全国广泛人群数据库的趋势与结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 14;13(18):5454. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185454.
6
Propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a national series.开放性与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术围手术期结局的倾向评分匹配比较:一项全国性系列研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):715-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.026. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephroureterectomy: A population-based analysis.开放与微创肾输尿管切除术围手术期结局比较:基于人群的分析。
Int J Urol. 2019 Apr;26(4):487-492. doi: 10.1111/iju.13916. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Comparison of Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开放性与腹腔镜及手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):656-681. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0662. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Muscle-Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Subanalysis of the Multi-Institutional National Database of the Japanese Urological Association.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗肌层浸润性上尿路尿路上皮癌:日本泌尿外科学会多机构全国数据库的亚分析
J Endourol. 2016 May;30(5):520-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0757. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌患者预后的比较:一项回顾性、多中心、倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;51(3):963-972. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.465. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Radical nephroureterectomy vs kidney sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in solitary kidney patients: a multi-institutional analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry.根治性肾输尿管切除术与保留肾手术治疗孤立肾患者上尿路尿路上皮癌:ROBUUST 2.0注册研究的多机构分析
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 3;43(1):534. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05882-0.
2
New Insights into Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Lessons Learned from the ROBUUST Collaborative Study.上尿路尿路上皮癌的新见解:从ROBUUST协作研究中获得的经验教训。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 15;17(10):1668. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101668.
3
Urology Interest Groups and Surgical Skills Sessions - Increasing Medical Student Interest in Urology.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: A Population-Based Analysis of Contemporary Trends, Outcomes, Costs, and Impact of Social Determinants of Health.微创肾上腺切除术:基于人群的当代趋势、结局、成本分析,以及健康社会决定因素的影响。
Urol Pract. 2024 Mar;11(2):293-302. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000505. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
Oncologic outcomes of patients treated with kidney-sparing surgery or radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based study.保留肾单位手术或根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的肿瘤学结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Jan;42(1):22.e1-22.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.019. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
3
泌尿外科兴趣小组与外科技能培训课程——提高医学生对泌尿外科的兴趣
Curr Urol Rep. 2025 May 7;26(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01269-1.
Robot-assisted Periprostatic Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Men with Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Description of the Surgical Technique and Comparison of Long-term Functional Outcomes with the Open Approach.
机器人辅助前列腺周人工尿道括约肌植入术治疗神经源性压力性尿失禁男性:手术技术描述及与开放手术的长期功能结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.025. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Application of the single-port robotic platform during radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: feasibility of the single-port robot in the multi-quadrant setting.单孔机器人平台在上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术中的应用:单孔机器人在多象限手术中的可行性。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):1469-1474. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-48. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
Retroperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision: Initial Experience and Description of the Technique.经腹膜后单孔机器人辅助肾盂输尿管切除术并膀胱袖状切除术:初步经验及技术描述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 21;12(18):6091. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186091.
6
Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes.微创根治性肾输尿管切除术:技术与结果的5年更新
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 15;15(18):4585. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184585.
7
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后的肿瘤学结局:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Aug 31;12(8):1351-1362. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-882. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
8
Diagnosis and Management of Non-Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: AUA/SUO Guideline.非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的诊断与管理:美国泌尿外科学会/泌尿外科学会指南
J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1071-1081. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003480. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
Social determinants of health and surgical care.健康与外科护理的社会决定因素。
Curr Probl Surg. 2023 Apr;60(4):101300. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101300. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
10
Comment on "Artificial intelligence to predict oncological outcome directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides in urology: a systematic review".对“人工智能直接从泌尿外科苏木精和伊红染色切片预测肿瘤学结果:一项系统综述”的评论
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Dec;74(6):810-812. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.05180-1.