Khader Abdul, Jain Sulabh, Mishra Shweta, Saleem Sumera, Vijayan Anu
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Science, Puducherry, India.
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalka Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1795-S1797. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1145_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
Dental imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and treatment planning, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and medical computed tomography (CT) being two common modalities. This study aims to compare the radiation doses associated with CBCT and medical CT imaging in dental applications to assess their relative safety and efficacy.
We conducted a retrospective study using data from 100 patients who underwent both CBCT and medical CT scans for dental purposes. The radiation doses were measured in terms of dose-length product (DLP) for medical CT and dose-area product (DAP) for CBCT. The effective dose (ED) was calculated using appropriate conversion factors. Patient demographics, scan parameters, and radiation doses were recorded and analyzed.
The results indicated that the mean DLP for medical CT scans was 220 mGycm, whereas the mean DAP for CBCT scans was 150 mGycm². The corresponding mean effective doses for medical CT and CBCT were 2.5 mSv and 1.8 mSv, respectively. The radiation dose from CBCT was found to be approximately 28% lower than that from medical CT.
This study demonstrates that CBCT imaging for dental applications results in significantly lower radiation doses compared to medical CT. While both modalities provide valuable diagnostic information, the choice of imaging technique should consider the balance between diagnostic quality and radiation exposure, especially for pediatric and high-risk patients. Dental practitioners should be aware of the potential dose reduction benefits associated with CBCT when appropriate for the clinical scenario.
牙科影像学在诊断和治疗计划中起着至关重要的作用,锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和医学计算机断层扫描(CT)是两种常见的方式。本研究旨在比较牙科应用中CBCT和医学CT成像的辐射剂量,以评估它们的相对安全性和有效性。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,使用了100例因牙科目的同时接受CBCT和医学CT扫描的患者的数据。医学CT的辐射剂量以剂量长度乘积(DLP)衡量,CBCT的辐射剂量以剂量面积乘积(DAP)衡量。使用适当的转换因子计算有效剂量(ED)。记录并分析患者的人口统计学信息、扫描参数和辐射剂量。
结果表明,医学CT扫描的平均DLP为220 mGycm,而CBCT扫描的平均DAP为150 mGycm²。医学CT和CBCT相应的平均有效剂量分别为2.5 mSv和1.8 mSv。发现CBCT的辐射剂量比医学CT低约28%。
本研究表明,与医学CT相比,牙科应用中的CBCT成像产生的辐射剂量显著更低。虽然两种方式都提供有价值的诊断信息,但成像技术的选择应考虑诊断质量和辐射暴露之间的平衡,特别是对于儿科和高危患者。牙科从业者在适用于临床情况时应意识到与CBCT相关的潜在剂量降低益处。