Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola 52, 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Medicina Nucleare, Policlinico Universitario Di Bari, Piazzale Giulio Cesare 11, Bari, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2022 Feb;127(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01439-4. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
To assess efficacy and safety of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of osteoid osteoma (OO) in children and adolescents, and to compare technical success, clinical success, radiation dose and procedure duration time of CBCT guidance to conventional computed tomography (CT) guidance.
Between 2015 and 2019, 53 consecutive percutaneous RFA were performed on pediatric patients with CBCT or conventional CT guidance, respectively, in 24 and 29 children and adolescents with 24-month follow-up. Dose area product (DAP) and dose length product (DLP) were recorded, respectively, for CBCT and conventional CT and converted to effective doses (ED).
CBCT and conventional CT groups were similar in terms of patient age and weight, tumor size and tumor location. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Primary clinical success was 91.67% (22/24) for the CBCT group and 89.66% (26/29) for the conventional CT group. Mean DAP was 64.75Gycm2 (range 6.0-266.7). Mean DLP was 972.62mGycm (range 337-2344). ED was significantly lower in the CBCT group compared to the conventional CT group (0.34 mSv vs. 5.53 mSv, p = 0.0119). Procedure duration time was not significantly longer in the CBCT group (102.25 min vs. 92.34 min, p = 0.065). No major complication was registered. Minor complications were observed in 4 patients (2 in CBCT; 2 in conventional CT).
Compared to conventional CT guidance, CBCT guidance for percutaneous OO ablation shows similar technical and clinical success rates, with reduced radiation dose and equivalent procedure duration time. This technique helps sparing dose exposure to pediatric patients.
评估锥形束 CT(CBCT)在儿童和青少年骨样骨瘤(OO)射频消融(RFA)中的疗效和安全性,并比较 CBCT 引导与传统 CT 引导的技术成功率、临床成功率、辐射剂量和手术持续时间。
2015 年至 2019 年间,分别采用 CBCT 或传统 CT 引导对 53 例儿童患者进行经皮 RFA,24 例和 29 例儿童分别采用 CBCT 和传统 CT 引导,随访 24 个月。记录 CBCT 和传统 CT 的剂量面积乘积(DAP)和剂量长度乘积(DLP),并分别转换为有效剂量(ED)。
CBCT 和传统 CT 组患者年龄、体重、肿瘤大小和肿瘤位置相似。所有病例均达到技术成功。CBCT 组和传统 CT 组的主要临床成功率分别为 91.67%(22/24)和 89.66%(26/29)。平均 DAP 为 64.75Gycm2(范围 6.0-266.7)。平均 DLP 为 972.62mGycm(范围 337-2344)。与传统 CT 组相比,CBCT 组 ED 显著降低(0.34mSv vs. 5.53mSv,p=0.0119)。CBCT 组手术持续时间并不明显更长(102.25min vs. 92.34min,p=0.065)。未发生主要并发症。4 例患者出现轻微并发症(CBCT 组 2 例,传统 CT 组 2 例)。
与传统 CT 引导相比,CBCT 引导在儿童 OO 消融中具有相似的技术和临床成功率,可降低辐射剂量,手术持续时间相当。该技术有助于减少儿童患者的辐射暴露。