Davis Elizabeth S, Poulson Michael R, Yarbro Alaina A, Franks Jeffrey A, Bhatia Smita, Kenzik Kelly M
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Cancer. 2024 Oct 15;130(20):3487-3495. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35437. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
Despite Medicare coverage, financial hardship is a prevalent issue among those diagnosed with cancer at age 65 years and older, particularly among those belonging to a racial or ethnic minority group. Sociodemographic, clinical, and area-level factors may mediate this relationship; however, no studies have assessed the extent to which these factors contribute to the racial/ethnic disparities in financial hardship.
Surveys assessing financial hardship were completed by 721 White (84%) or Black (16%) patients (aged 65 years and older) who were diagnosed with breast (34%), prostate (27%), lung (17%), or colorectal (14%) cancer or lymphoma (9%) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2000 and 2019. Financial hardship included material, psychological, and behavioral domains. Nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca effect decomposition methods were used to evaluate the extent to which individual and area-level factors contribute to racial disparities in financial hardship.
Black patients reported lower income (65% vs. 34% earning <$50,000) and greater scores on the Area Deprivation Index (median, 93.0 vs. 55.0). Black patients reported significantly higher rates of overall (39% vs. 18%), material (29% vs. 11%), and psychological (27% vs. 11%) hardship compared with White patients. Overall, the observed characteristics explained 51% of racial differences in financial hardship among cancer survivors, primarily because of differences in income (23%) and area deprivation (11%).
The current results identify primary contributors to racial disparities in financial hardship among older cancer survivors, which can be used to develop targeted interventions and allocate resources to those at greatest risk for financial hardship.
尽管有医疗保险覆盖,但经济困难在65岁及以上的癌症患者中是一个普遍问题,尤其是在少数种族或族裔群体中。社会人口统计学、临床和地区层面的因素可能会调节这种关系;然而,尚无研究评估这些因素在多大程度上导致了经济困难方面的种族/族裔差异。
2000年至2019年期间,在阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校,721名白人(84%)或黑人(16%)患者(年龄在65岁及以上)完成了评估经济困难的调查,这些患者被诊断患有乳腺癌(34%)、前列腺癌(27%)、肺癌(17%)、结直肠癌(14%)或淋巴瘤(9%)。经济困难包括物质、心理和行为领域。采用非线性布林德-奥瓦卡效应分解方法来评估个人和地区层面因素在经济困难方面种族差异中的作用程度。
黑人患者报告收入较低(收入低于5万美元的比例为65%对34%),且地区贫困指数得分更高(中位数分别为93.0和55.0)。与白人患者相比,黑人患者报告的总体(39%对18%)、物质(29%对11%)和心理(27%对11%)困难发生率显著更高。总体而言,观察到的特征解释了癌症幸存者经济困难方面51%的种族差异,主要是由于收入(23%)和地区贫困(11%)的差异。
目前的结果确定了老年癌症幸存者经济困难方面种族差异的主要因素,可用于制定有针对性的干预措施,并将资源分配给经济困难风险最大的人群。