• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肾脏病与经静脉心脏植入式电子装置感染:对医疗保健利用、成本、疾病进展和死亡率是否有影响?

Chronic kidney disease and transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device infection-is there an impact on healthcare utilization, costs, disease progression, and mortality?

机构信息

Cardiology Division, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta and Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae169.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euae169
PMID:38890126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11223657/
Abstract

AIMS

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are a burden to hospitals and costly for healthcare systems. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of CIED infections, but its differential impact on healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective analysis used de-identified Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to identify patients implanted with a CIED from July 2016 to December 2020. Outcomes were defined as hospital days and costs within 12 months post-implant, post-infection CKD progression, and mortality. Generalized linear models were used to calculate results by CKD and infection status while controlling for other comorbidities, with differences between cohorts representing the incremental effect associated with CKD. A total of 584 543 patients had a CIED implant, of which 26% had CKD and 1.4% had a device infection. The average total days in hospital for infected patients was 23.5 days with CKD vs. 14.5 days (P < 0.001) without. The average cost of infection was $121 756 with CKD vs. $55 366 without (P < 0.001), leading to an incremental cost associated with CKD of $66 390. Infected patients with CKD were more likely to have septicaemia or severe sepsis than those without CKD (11.0 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.001). After infection, CKD patients were more likely to experience CKD progression (hazard ratio 1.26, P < 0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.89, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in patients with CKD was associated with more healthcare utilization, higher cost, greater disease progression, and greater mortality compared to patients without CKD.

摘要

目的

心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染给医院带来了负担,也给医疗保健系统造成了巨大的经济负担。慢性肾脏病(CKD)增加了 CIED 感染的风险,但它对医疗利用、成本和结果的不同影响尚不清楚。

方法和结果

本回顾性分析使用去识别的医疗保险费用服务索赔数据,确定了 2016 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间植入 CIED 的患者。结果定义为植入后 12 个月内的住院天数和费用、感染后 CKD 进展和死亡率。使用广义线性模型,在控制其他合并症的情况下,根据 CKD 和感染状况计算结果,队列之间的差异代表与 CKD 相关的增量效应。共有 584543 名患者植入了 CIED,其中 26%患有 CKD,1.4%患有设备感染。感染患者的平均住院总天数为 23.5 天,而无 CKD 的患者为 14.5 天(P < 0.001)。感染的平均费用为 CKD 患者 121756 美元,而无 CKD 患者为 55366 美元(P < 0.001),导致 CKD 相关的增量成本为 66390 美元。患有 CKD 的感染患者比没有 CKD 的患者更有可能患有败血症或严重败血症(11.0%比 4.6%,P < 0.001)。感染后,CKD 患者更有可能出现 CKD 进展(风险比 1.26,P < 0.001)和死亡(风险比 1.89,P < 0.001)。

结论

与没有 CKD 的患者相比,患有 CKD 的 CIED 感染患者的医疗保健利用、成本更高、疾病进展更大、死亡率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/ef3edd4210b5/euae169f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/6961c33b07cc/euae169_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/fb77f48864d7/euae169f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/84ab802c5a32/euae169f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/46282cb7a0b4/euae169f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/9adf2c6affe1/euae169f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/46b4b44d4512/euae169f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/3c5d8d4c776f/euae169f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/ef3edd4210b5/euae169f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/6961c33b07cc/euae169_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/fb77f48864d7/euae169f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/84ab802c5a32/euae169f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/46282cb7a0b4/euae169f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/9adf2c6affe1/euae169f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/46b4b44d4512/euae169f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/3c5d8d4c776f/euae169f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798e/11223657/ef3edd4210b5/euae169f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Chronic kidney disease and transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device infection-is there an impact on healthcare utilization, costs, disease progression, and mortality?慢性肾脏病与经静脉心脏植入式电子装置感染:对医疗保健利用、成本、疾病进展和死亡率是否有影响?
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae169.
2
Impact of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: A Clinical and Economic Analysis of the WRAP-IT Trial.心脏植入式电子设备感染的影响:WRAP-IT 试验的临床和经济分析。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 May;13(5):e008280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008280. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
3
Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections in the United States: A population-based cohort study.美国心脏植入式电子设备感染的流行病学:基于人群的队列研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jul;17(7):1125-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
Health and Economic Outcomes Associated with Use of an Antimicrobial Envelope as a Standard of Care for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.与使用抗菌封套作为心脏植入式电子设备植入护理标准相关的健康和经济结果
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;26(7):783-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12684. Epub 2015 May 25.
5
Mortality and cost associated with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.与心血管植入式电子设备感染相关的死亡率和成本。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1821-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.441. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
6
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection and Extraction Trends in the U.S.美国心脏植入式电子设备相关感染及拔除趋势
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;40(3):286-293. doi: 10.1111/pace.13009. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
The predictors and economic burden of early-, mid- and late-onset cardiac implantable electronic device infections: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省回顾性队列研究:早、中、晚期心脏植入式电子设备感染的预测因素和经济负担。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):255.e1-255.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Treatment patterns, costs, and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with CIED infection.患有心脏植入电子设备(CIED)感染的医疗保险受益人的治疗模式、费用和死亡率。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;41(5):495-503. doi: 10.1111/pace.13300. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
9
Device-related infection and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving cardiac implantable electronic devices: a propensity score-matched cohort study.心脏植入式电子设备在慢性肾脏病患者中的应用:与器械相关感染和死亡率的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08773-0.
10
Incidence, Treatment Intensity, and Incremental Annual Expenditures for Patients Experiencing a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Evidence From a Large US Payer Database 1-Year Post Implantation.心脏植入式电子设备感染患者的发生率、治疗强度和增量年度支出:植入后 1 年来自大型美国支付者数据库的证据。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.003929.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of an intraoperative antibacterial envelope in preventing cardiac implantable device-associated infections: a systematic review.术中抗菌包膜预防心脏植入式设备相关感染的成本效益:一项系统评价
Europace. 2025 Jul 1;27(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf121.
2
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and an Appraisal of Current Evidence.植入式心脏复律除颤器预防肾移植受者心脏性猝死:病例系列及当前证据评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 29;13(19):5820. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195820.

本文引用的文献

1
Leadless pacemakers at 5-year follow-up: the Micra transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry.5 年随访的无导线起搏器:Micra 经导管起搏系统上市后注册研究。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 7;45(14):1241-1251. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae101.
2
Real-world evidence on the association between cardiac implantable electronic device infection and all-cause mortality.心脏植入式电子设备感染与全因死亡率的真实世界证据。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad274.
3
Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation and device-related infection.
心脏植入式电子设备植入与设备相关感染。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad208.
4
REducing INFectiOns thRough Cardiac device Envelope: insight from real world data. The REINFORCE project.通过心脏器械包被降低感染:真实世界数据的洞察。REINFORCE 项目。
Europace. 2023 Nov 2;25(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad224.
5
Long-term survival following transvenous lead extraction: unpicking differences according to sex.经静脉导线拔除术后的长期生存:根据性别剖析差异。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad214.
6
A Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker.双腔无导线起搏器。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 22;388(25):2360-2370. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300080. Epub 2023 May 20.
7
Association of the Timing and Extent of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections With Mortality.心脏植入式电子设备感染的时机和程度与死亡率的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 May 1;8(5):484-491. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0467.
8
Leadless versus transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers: 3 year follow-up of the Micra CED study.无导线与经静脉单腔心室起搏器:Micra CED 研究 3 年随访。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;34(4):1015-1023. doi: 10.1111/jce.15863. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
UK Expert Consensus Statement for the Optimal Use and Clinical Utility of Leadless Pacing Systems on Behalf of the British Heart Rhythm Society.代表英国心律学会发布的关于无导线起搏系统最佳使用和临床效用的英国专家共识声明。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2022 Apr;11:e19. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.17.
10
Efficacy and Safety of an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的疗效和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 6;387(14):1292-1302. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206485. Epub 2022 Aug 28.