Correlation between cognitive changes and neuroradiological changes over time in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

While many studies have examined relationships of neuroimaging variables to cognitive measures in multiple sclerosis (MS), longitudinal studies are lacking. The relationship of cognitive changes to neuroradiological changes in MS is thus incompletely understood. The present study systematically reviews all studies reporting a relationship between MRI changes and cognitive changes after at least one year of follow-up.

METHOD

An extensive and methodical search of online databases was conducted to identify qualified studies until August 2023. Among various cognitive tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), verbal fluency, T2 lesion volume (T2LV), white matter lesion volume (WML), and grey matter volume (GMV) qualified for inclusion in a meta-analysis investigating the association of cognitive changes to neuroradiological changes.

RESULTS

We identified 35 studies that explored the link between MRI changes and changes in cognitive outcomes. Of these, twenty studies (57.14%) investigated the association between SDMT/PASAT and MRI metrics. Eleven studies (31.42%) focused on the relationship between MRI metrics and verbal learning and memory, while ten studies (28.57%) reported associations with visuospatial learning and memory. Furthermore, eight studies (22.85%) analyzed the correlation between verbal fluency and MRI measures. Only 5 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis evaluated correlations between SDMT/PASAT and GMV (r = 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-0.91), and verbal fluency and T2LV (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.09-0.60).

CONCLUSION

In this rigorously conducted systematic review, we found a significant association of cognitive changes, specifically SDMT/PASAT and verbal fluency, to changes in T2LV and atrophy in individuals with MS. Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited amount of high-quality research, small sample sizes, and variability in study methodologies.