Suppr超能文献

阴茎癌部分阴茎切除术与全阴茎切除术的比较结果:一项关于人口统计学和术后并发症的回顾性队列研究。

Comparative outcomes of partial versus total penectomy for penile carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study on demographics and postoperative complications.

作者信息

Velasquez David A, Liu Allison, Kalidoss Senthooran, Yeaman Clinton, Bryk Darren, Fustok Judy N, Shelton Thomas M, Alhameedi Hasan, Payakachat Nalin, Kamel Mohamed, Ledesma Braian R, Khalil Mahmoud I, Smith Ryan, Raheem Omer

机构信息

University of Chicago, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Virginia, Department of Urology, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2024 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00935-1.

Abstract

When feasible from an oncologic standpoint, partial penectomy (PP) is often preferred to total penectomy (TP) for penile cancer treatment, for the preservation of functional urinary outcomes. However, to date, there has not been a direct comparison of perioperative outcomes between PP and TP. Comparing treatments for penile cancer has proven difficult due to the rarity of penile cancer in the United States. We aimed to report differences in pre-operative risk factors, intra-operative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes between TP and PP for penile cancer. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we conducted a retrospective cohort review of penile cancer patients enlisted in the database between the years 2006-2016 using the International Classification of Diseases clinical modification 9th revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. PP patients were less likely to be transferred patients (p = 0.002), diabetic (p = 0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. PP patients also had shorter lengths of stay in the hospital (p < 0.001) and operating time (p < 0.001). Significant differences were also found for inpatient stay (p < 0.001), 30-day post-surgery complications (p < 0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.017), wound disruption (p = 0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (p = 0.029), and sepsis (p < 0.005). Finally, PP patients required fewer concurrent surgical procedures (p < 0.001). Demographic differences between PP and TP patients may reflect patients presenting with more advanced oncologic disease. PP is associated with fewer postoperative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, fewer concurrent surgical procedures, and comorbid conditions compared to TP. A gap remains in the reported data pertaining to postoperative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level.

摘要

从肿瘤学角度看可行时,阴茎癌治疗通常首选部分阴茎切除术(PP)而非全阴茎切除术(TP),以保留功能性排尿结果。然而,迄今为止,尚未对PP和TP的围手术期结果进行直接比较。由于美国阴茎癌罕见,比较阴茎癌的治疗方法已被证明很困难。我们旨在报告阴茎癌TP和PP在术前危险因素、术中结果和术后结果方面的差异。利用国家外科质量改进计划数据库,我们对2006年至2016年期间使用国际疾病分类第9版临床修订代码纳入该数据库的阴茎癌患者进行了回顾性队列研究。共纳入260例患者,其中67例TP患者和193例PP患者。PP患者不太可能是转院患者(p = 0.002)、糖尿病患者(p = 0.026),术前实验室值更有可能在正常范围内。PP患者的住院时间(p < 0.001)和手术时间(p < 0.001)也较短。在住院时间(p < 0.001)、术后30天并发症(p < 0.001)、深部切口手术部位感染(SSI)(p = 0.017)、伤口裂开(p = 0.017)、术中或术后输血(p = 0.029)和脓毒症(p < 0.005)方面也发现了显著差异。最后,PP患者需要的同期手术程序更少(p < 0.001)。PP和TP患者之间的人口统计学差异可能反映了患有更晚期肿瘤疾病的患者情况。与TP相比,PP术后并发症更少、手术时间更短、住院时间更短、同期手术程序更少且合并症更少。在国家层面,关于PP术后性功能和勃起结果的报告数据仍存在差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验