Franzo Giovanni, Dotto Giorgia, Lupini Caterina, Legnardi Matteo, Tucciarone Claudia Maria, Poletto Francesca, Catelli Elena, Graziosi Giulia, Cecchinato Mattia, Pasotto Daniela
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 29;14(11):1619. doi: 10.3390/ani14111619.
Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is a significant burden for poultry production and market due to both direct disease and induced immunosuppression. In the present study, the expression of different cytokines in the bursa of Fabricius and thymus was evaluated during a 28-day-long experimental infection with two strains classified in the G1a (Classical) and G6 (ITA) genogroups. Although both strains significantly affected and modulated the expression of different molecules, the G6 strain seemed to induce a delayed immune response or suppress it more promptly. A recovery in the expression of several mediators was observed in the G1a-infected group at the end of the study, but not in the G6 one, further supporting a more persistent immunosuppression. This evidence fits with the higher replication level previously reported for the G6 and with the clinical outcome, as this genotype, although subclinical, has often been considered more immunosuppressive. However, unlike other studies focused on shorter time periods after infection, the patterns observed in this paper were highly variable and complex, depending on the strain, tissue, and time point, and characterized by a non-negligible within-group variability. Besides confirming the strain/genogroup effect on immune system modulation, the present study suggests the usefulness of longer monitoring activities after experimental infection to better understand the complex patterns and interactions with the host response.
传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)对家禽生产和市场而言是一个重大负担,这是由直接发病和诱导免疫抑制共同导致的。在本研究中,在对分类于G1a(经典型)和G6(ITA)基因群的两种毒株进行为期28天的实验性感染期间,评估了法氏囊和胸腺中不同细胞因子的表达情况。尽管两种毒株均显著影响并调节了不同分子的表达,但G6毒株似乎诱导了延迟的免疫反应或更迅速地抑制了免疫反应。在研究结束时,在G1a感染组中观察到几种介质的表达有所恢复,但在G6感染组中未观察到,这进一步支持了更持久的免疫抑制。这一证据与先前报道的G6毒株更高的复制水平以及临床结果相符,因为这种基因型尽管为亚临床型,但通常被认为具有更强的免疫抑制作用。然而,与其他关注感染后较短时间段的研究不同,本文观察到的模式高度可变且复杂,这取决于毒株、组织和时间点,并且组内变异性不可忽视。除了证实毒株/基因群对免疫系统调节的影响外,本研究还表明在实验性感染后进行更长时间的监测活动有助于更好地理解复杂模式以及与宿主反应的相互作用。