Murias Eduardo, Puig Josep, Serna-Candel Carmen, Gonzalez Eva María, Moreu Manuel, Jiménez-Gómez Elvira, SanRoman Luis, Aparici-Robles Fernando, Terceño Mikel, Martínez Antonio Mosqueira, Aixut Sonia, Romero Veredas, Mendez Jose Carlos, Sagredo-Barra Antonio, Aguilar Yeray, Espinosa de Rueda Mariano, Blázquez Miguel Angel Castaño, Bashir Saima, Rodríguez Castro José, Lopez-Frías Alfonso, Jiménez Jose María, Chaviano Juan, Maestro Victor, Manso Javier, Lopez-Rueda Antonio, Remollo Sebastià, Morales-Caba Lluis, Comas-Cufí Marc, Vega Pedro
Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and IDIBAPS, 08023 Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 26;13(11):3123. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113123.
Although stentrievers (SRs) have been a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and current guidelines recommend the use of SRs in the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO), there is a paucity of studies in the literature comparing SRs directly against each other in terms of mechanical and functional properties. Timely access to endovascular therapy and the ability to restore intracranial flow in a safe, efficient, and efficacious manner have been critical to the success of MT. This study aimed to investigate the impact of contemporary SR characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, on the first-pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Consecutive patients with M1 occlusion treated with a single SR+BGC were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. The primary outcome was the FPE that was defined as modified (mFPE) or true (tFPE) for the achievement of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grades 2b-3 or 3 after a single device pass, respectively. We compared patients who achieved mFPE with those who achieved tFPE according to SR characteristics. We included 610 patients (52.3% female and 47.7% male, mean age 75.1 ± 13.62 years). mFPE was achieved in 357 patients (58.5%), whereas tFPE was achieved in 264 (43.3%). There was no significant association between SR characteristics and mFPE or tFPE. Specifically, the SR size did not show a statistically significant relationship with improvement in FPE. Similarly, the length of the SR did not yield significant differences in the mFPE and tFPE, even when the data were grouped. : Our data indicate that contemporary SR-mediated thrombectomy characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, do not significantly affect the FPE.
尽管取栓支架(SRs)一直是机械取栓(MT)的主要手段,且当前指南推荐在治疗大血管闭塞性卒中(LVO)时使用SRs,但文献中缺乏关于SRs在机械和功能特性方面直接相互比较的研究。及时获得血管内治疗以及以安全、高效和有效的方式恢复颅内血流的能力对MT的成功至关重要。本研究旨在调查当代SR的特征,包括型号、品牌、尺寸和长度,对急性缺血性卒中患者首次通过效应(FPE)的影响。从ROSSSETTI登记处招募了连续接受单一SR+BGC治疗的M1段闭塞患者。主要结局是FPE,分别定义为单次器械通过后达到改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)2b-3级或3级时的改良(mFPE)或真实(tFPE)FPE。我们根据SR特征比较了达到mFPE的患者和达到tFPE的患者。我们纳入了610例患者(女性52.3%,男性47.7%,平均年龄75.1±13.62岁)。357例患者(58.5%)达到mFPE,而264例(43.3%)达到tFPE。SR特征与mFPE或tFPE之间无显著关联。具体而言,SR尺寸与FPE改善之间未显示出统计学上的显著关系。同样,即使对数据进行分组,SR的长度在mFPE和tFPE方面也未产生显著差异。我们的数据表明,当代SR介导的取栓特征,包括型号、品牌、尺寸和长度,不会显著影响FPE。