• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撤回:一项比较非布司他和埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎疗效和安全性的III期头对头研究。

RETRACTED: A Phase III Head-to-Head Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Treating Patients with Erosive Esophagitis.

作者信息

Jeong Yuchul, Lee Beom Jun, Han Se-Hyeon

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Chungna Good Hospital, Incheon 22738, Republic of Korea.

St. Mary's Best ENT Clinic, Seoul 08849, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3262. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113262.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13113262
PMID:38892973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11172701/
Abstract

Fexuprazan (Fexuclue; Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III study was conducted to assess its efficacy and safety compared with esomeprazole (Nexium; AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden) in Korean patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). This study evaluated patients diagnosed with EE at a total of 25 institutions in Korea between 13 December 2018 and 7 August 2019. After voluntarily submitting a written informed consent form, the patients were evaluated using a screening test and then randomized to either of the two treatment arms. The proportion of the patients who achieved the complete recovery of mucosal breaks at 4 and 8 weeks, the proportion of those who achieved the complete recovery of heartburn at 3 and 7 days and 8 weeks, and changes in the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) scores at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline served as efficacy outcome measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the serum gastrin levels served as safety outcome measures. The study population comprised a total of 231 patients ( = 231) with EE, including 152 men (65.80%) and 79 women (34.20%); their mean age was 54.37 ± 12.66 years old. There were no significant differences in the efficacy and safety outcome measures between the two treatment arms ( > 0.05). It can be concluded that the efficacy and safety of Fexuclue are not inferior to those of esomeprazole in Korean patients with EE.

摘要

非索拉唑(Fexuclue;韩国首尔大宇制药有限公司)是一种新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)。本多中心、随机、双盲、活性对照、平行组、治疗性确证III期研究旨在评估在韩国糜烂性食管炎(EE)患者中,与埃索美拉唑(耐信;瑞典哥德堡阿斯利康公司)相比,其疗效和安全性。本研究对2018年12月13日至2019年8月7日期间韩国25家机构诊断为EE的患者进行了评估。患者自愿提交书面知情同意书后,通过筛查试验进行评估,然后随机分为两个治疗组。4周和8周时黏膜破损完全愈合的患者比例、3天、7天和8周时烧心完全缓解的患者比例,以及4周和8周时与胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量问卷(GERD-HRQL)评分相对于基线的变化作为疗效指标。治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和药物不良反应(ADR)的发生率以及血清胃泌素水平作为安全性指标。研究人群包括231例EE患者(n = 231),其中男性152例(65.80%),女性79例(34.20%);平均年龄为54.37±12.66岁。两个治疗组在疗效和安全性指标方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。可以得出结论,在韩国EE患者中,Fexuclue的疗效和安全性不劣于埃索美拉唑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/6ce2f5b58907/jcm-13-03262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/9cd2b1de42e4/jcm-13-03262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/2c8e11022a7d/jcm-13-03262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/d04b4dd5ec02/jcm-13-03262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/6ce2f5b58907/jcm-13-03262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/9cd2b1de42e4/jcm-13-03262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/2c8e11022a7d/jcm-13-03262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/d04b4dd5ec02/jcm-13-03262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3469/11172701/6ce2f5b58907/jcm-13-03262-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
RETRACTED: A Phase III Head-to-Head Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Treating Patients with Erosive Esophagitis.撤回:一项比较非布司他和埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎疗效和安全性的III期头对头研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3262. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113262.
2
The efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in treating erosive esophagitis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.在治疗糜烂性食管炎方面,非索拉唑的疗效和安全性:一项 III 期、随机、双盲、多中心研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;39(4):658-666. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16471. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis.随机对照试验评估 fexuprazan 与埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎的疗效和安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 28;28(44):6294-6309. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294.
4
Efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg in erosive esophagitis compared to HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) 40 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study.HIP1601(双重延迟释放埃索美拉唑)40mg 治疗糜烂性食管炎的疗效和安全性与 HGP1705(延迟释放埃索美拉唑)40mg 相当:一项多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03087-6.
5
Randomized Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan According to the Timing of Dosing in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis.一项随机多中心研究,旨在根据给药时间评估非布司他对糜烂性食管炎患者的疗效和安全性。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jan 31;31(1):86-94. doi: 10.5056/jnm24032. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
6
Review of the clinical development of fexuprazan for gastroesophageal reflux-related disease.综述:非索拉唑在胃食管反流相关疾病中的临床研究进展
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;79(8):1023-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03521-4. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan (LXI-15028) vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority phase Ⅲ trial.替戈拉赞(LXI-15028)与埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性Ⅲ期试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Oct 30. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003276.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan Versus Esomeprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Chronic Cough: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Exploratory Trial.非布司他与埃索美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病相关慢性咳嗽的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、活性对照探索性试验。
Lung. 2025 Apr 29;203(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00408-025-00815-5.
9
Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized controlled trial.埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎GERD患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Mar;96(3):656-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.3600_b.x.
10
Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Zastaprazan Compared With Esomeprazole in Erosive Esophagitis.一项随机、双盲、活性对照3期研究,旨在评估扎斯塔拉唑与埃索美拉唑相比治疗糜烂性食管炎的疗效和安全性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 1;120(2):353-361. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002929. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastric Ulcers: Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis With Cross-Inference Through a Quality management System.钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂与质子泵抑制剂治疗胃溃疡的疗效:通过质量管理体系进行交叉推断的贝叶斯和频率学派网络荟萃分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2025 Feb 5;102:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100776. eCollection 2025.
2
RETRACTED: Jeong et al. A Phase III Head-to-Head Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Treating Patients with Erosive Esophagitis. 2024, , 3262.撤回:郑等人。一项比较非布司他和埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎患者疗效和安全性的III期头对头研究。2024年,,3262。 (注:原文中部分逗号处内容缺失,翻译可能存在一定局限性)
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 25;13(21):6388. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216388.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Beyond Proton Pump Inhibitors.治疗胃食管反流病的新疗法:质子泵抑制剂之外。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Mar 17;22(4):16. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-0753-y.
2
Editorial: potassium-competitive acid blockers for acid-related diseases-tegoprazan, a new kid on the block.社论:用于酸相关疾病的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂——替戈拉赞,该领域的新成员。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Oct;50(8):960-962. doi: 10.1111/apt.15480.
3
Review: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection 2019.综述:2019 年幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗。
Helicobacter. 2019 Sep;24 Suppl 1:e12640. doi: 10.1111/hel.12640.
4
Phase III, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan compared with lansoprazole in Asian patients with erosive oesophagitis.一项评估沃诺拉赞对比兰索拉唑在亚洲糜烂性食管炎患者中的疗效和安全性的 III 期、随机、双盲、多中心研究。
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):224-230. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318365. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Randomised phase 3 trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis.随机 3 期临床试验:替戈拉赞,一种新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂,与埃索美拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎患者。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;49(7):864-872. doi: 10.1111/apt.15185. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Potassium-competitive acid blockers - are they the next generation of proton pump inhibitors?钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂——它们会是下一代质子泵抑制剂吗?
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec 13;9(7):63-68. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i7.63.
7
Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the initial relief of heartburn in patients with erosive oesophagitis.随机临床试验:Vonoprazan 与兰索拉唑治疗糜烂性食管炎患者烧心的初始缓解。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan;49(2):140-146. doi: 10.1111/apt.15062.
8
Role of Acid Suppression in Acid-related Diseases: Proton Pump Inhibitor and Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker.抑酸在酸相关性疾病中的作用:质子泵抑制剂与钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):6-14. doi: 10.5056/jnm18139.
9
Gastrointestinal hormones and regulation of gastric emptying.胃肠道激素与胃排空的调节。
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019 Feb;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000448.
10
Short-Term Symptomatic Relief in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Comparative Study of Esomeprazole and Vonoprazan.治疗胃食管反流病的短期症状缓解:埃索美拉唑和沃诺拉赞的对比研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Mar;64(3):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5365-0. Epub 2018 Nov 10.