Galati Giulia, Ruggiero Gianfilippo, Grobberio Alice, Capri Oriana, Pietrangeli Daniela, Recine Nadia, Vignali Michele, Muzii Ludovico
Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urology, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):3302. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113302.
: Adenomyosis is a benign condition characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue within the myometrium. Despite surgery being a valuable approach, medical options are considered as the first-line approach and have been investigated in the treatment of adenomyosis, although strong evidence in favor of these is still lacking. This study aims to gather all available data and determine the effectiveness of the aforementioned medical options in patients with associated pain and not currently seeking pregnancy, both in comparison to placebo and to one another. For this study, PubMed and EMBASE were used as data sources, searched up to January 2024. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance to guidelines from the Cochrane Collaboration. The primary outcomes investigated were changes in dysmenorrhea, quantified by means of VAS scores, HMB in terms of number of bleeding days, and changes in uterine volume determined at ultrasound. Twelve eligible studies were selected. The results highlighted that dienogest yields a reduction in dysmenorrhea that is significantly superior to that of the rest of the medical treatments investigated (-value of <0.0002). On the other hand, GnRH agonists seem to play a more prominent role in reducing uterine volume (-value of 0.003). While it was not possible to determine which medical treatment better decreased the number of bleeding days, it was observed that COC performed significantly worse than the other treatments studied (-value of 0.02). While this meta-analysis provides valuable insights in the comparative efficacy of different treatments, the paucity of relevant studies on the topic might impact the reliability of some of the conclusions drawn.
子宫腺肌病是一种良性疾病,其特征是子宫肌层内存在子宫内膜组织。尽管手术是一种有价值的治疗方法,但药物治疗被视为一线治疗方法,并且已经在子宫腺肌病的治疗中进行了研究,尽管仍然缺乏有力的证据支持这些治疗方法。本研究旨在收集所有可用数据,并确定上述药物治疗对伴有疼痛且目前不打算怀孕的患者的有效性,同时与安慰剂以及其他药物治疗进行比较。在本研究中,使用PubMed和EMBASE作为数据源,检索截至2024年1月的数据。根据Cochrane协作网的指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。研究的主要结局包括痛经的变化(通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)量化)、月经过多(以出血天数衡量)以及超声测定的子宫体积变化。共纳入12项符合条件的研究。结果表明,地诺孕素在减轻痛经方面的效果明显优于其他所研究的药物治疗(P值<0.0002)。另一方面,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂在缩小子宫体积方面似乎发挥着更显著的作用(P值为0.003)。虽然无法确定哪种药物治疗能更好地减少出血天数,但观察到复方口服避孕药(COC)的效果明显比其他所研究的治疗方法差(P值为0.02)。虽然这项荟萃分析为不同治疗方法的比较疗效提供了有价值的见解,但该主题相关研究的匮乏可能会影响所得出的一些结论的可靠性。