Kang Yeo Wool, Baek Yang Hyun, Lee Jong Hoon, Roh Young Hoon, Kwon Hee Jin, Moon Sang Yi, Son Min Kook, Jeong Jin Sook
Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 32 Daeshingongwonro, Seo-gu, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea.
Department of General Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 32 Daeshingongwonro, Seo-gu, Busan 49201, Republic of Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 22;14(11):1083. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111083.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum ranging from simple steatosis to fibrosis and cirrhosis. Fibrosis, associated with long-term overall mortality and liver-related events, requires evaluation. Traditionally, liver biopsy has been the gold standard for diagnosing fibrosis. However, its invasive nature, potential complications, and sampling variability limit widespread use. Consequently, various non-invasive tests have been developed as alternatives for diagnosing fibrosis in NAFLD patients.
This study aimed to compare the accuracy of non-invasive tests (NITs) and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), one of the point shear wave techniques, compared to conventional methods, assessing its effective role in diagnosis.
This is a retrospective study; a total of 136 patients diagnosed with fatty liver disease through ultrasonography were enrolled. The anthropometric data of the patients were collected on the day of admission and blood tests, measurements of ARFI, and a point shear test were conducted using abdominal ultrasound; a biopsy was performed the following day. In addition, we calculated the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) index based on four factors (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Subsequently, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of NITs within various subgroups based on the extent of obesity, steatosis, or NAFLD activity score.
ARFI has been shown to have the highest diagnostic value among various NITs, with AUROC values of 0.832, 0.794, 0.767, and 0.696 for ARFI, APRI, FIB-4, and NFS, respectively. In the morbidly obese subgroup, the AUROC values of ARFI, APRI, FIB-4, and NFS were 0.805, 0.769, 0.736, and 0.674. In the group with severe steatosis or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the AUROC values were 0.679, 0.596, 0.661, and 0.612, respectively, for severe steatosis and 0.789, 0.696, 0.751, and 0.691, respectively, for NASH.
In conclusion, ARFI is not affected by various factors and maintains diagnostic accuracy compared to serum NITs. Therefore, we can recommend ARFI as a valuable diagnostic test to screen for advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)涵盖了从单纯性脂肪变性到纤维化和肝硬化的异质性范围。与长期总体死亡率和肝脏相关事件相关的纤维化需要评估。传统上,肝活检一直是诊断纤维化的金标准。然而,其侵入性、潜在并发症和采样变异性限制了其广泛应用。因此,已开发出各种非侵入性检测方法作为NAFLD患者纤维化诊断的替代方法。
本研究旨在比较非侵入性检测(NITs)的准确性,并评估点剪切波技术之一的声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)与传统方法相比的诊断准确性,评估其在诊断中的有效作用。
这是一项回顾性研究;共纳入136例经超声诊断为脂肪性肝病的患者。在入院当天收集患者的人体测量数据,并进行血液检查、ARFI测量以及使用腹部超声进行点剪切试验;第二天进行活检。此外,我们根据四个因素(FIB-4)和NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)计算天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)。随后,我们根据肥胖程度、脂肪变性程度或NAFLD活动评分在各个亚组中评估NITs的诊断准确性。
在各种NITs中,ARFI显示出最高的诊断价值,ARFI、APRI FIB- 和NFS的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)值分别为0.832、0.794、0.767和0.696。在病态肥胖亚组中,ARFI、APRI、FIB-4和NFS的AUROC值分别为0.805、0.769、0.736和0.674。在重度脂肪变性或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)组中,重度脂肪变性的AUROC值分别为0.679、0.596、0.661和0.612,NASH的AUROC值分别为0.789、0.696、0.751和0.691。
总之,与血清NITs相比,ARFI不受各种因素影响并保持诊断准确性。因此,我们可以推荐ARFI作为一种有价值的诊断测试,用于筛查NAFLD患者的晚期纤维化。