Suppr超能文献

右束支传导阻滞可预测非缺血性扩张型心肌病且植入预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的合适植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗。

Right Bundle Branch Block Predicts Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapies in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy and a Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

作者信息

Jiménez-Blanco Bravo Marta, Alonso Salinas Gonzalo Luis, Parra Esteban Carolina, Toquero Ramos Jorge, Amores Luque Miguel, Zamorano Gómez Jose Luis, García-Izquierdo Eusebio, Álvarez-García Jesús, Fernández Lozano Ignacio, Castro Urda Víctor

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Vieno km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain.

Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular en Red (CIBER-CV), Avenida Monforte de Lemos 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;14(11):1173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111173.

Abstract

The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is still unclear, and the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a major challenge. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation between 2008 and 2020 in two tertiary centers. Our main goal was to identify the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] and/or shocks) in this cohort of patients. A total of 224 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 61 patients (27.2%) required appropriate ICD therapies. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more frequently men (87% vs. 69%, = 0.006), of younger age (59 years, (53-65) vs. 64 years, (57-70); = 0.02), showed more right bundle branch blocks (RBBBs) (15% vs. 4%, = 0.007) and less left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs) (26% vs. 47%, = 0.005) in the ECG, and had higher left ventricular end-diastolic (100 mL/m, (90-117) vs. 86, (71-110); = 0.011) and systolic volumes (72 mL/m, (59-87) vs. 61, (47-81), = 0.05). In a multivariate competing-risks regression analysis, RBBB (HR 2.26, CI 95% 1.02-4.98, = 0.043) was identified as an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies. RBBBs may help to identify patients with NICM at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and requiring ICD intervention.

摘要

预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在非缺血性起源的严重收缩功能障碍患者中的益处仍不明确,识别心脏性猝死风险患者仍然是一项重大挑战。我们回顾性分析了2008年至2020年期间在两家三级中心接受预防性ICD植入的所有连续性非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NICM)患者。我们的主要目标是确定该队列患者中适当ICD治疗(抗心动过速起搏[ATP]和/或电击)的预测因素。共纳入224例患者。中位随访51个月后,61例患者(27.2%)需要适当的ICD治疗。接受适当ICD治疗的患者男性更常见(87%对69%,P = 0.006),年龄较轻(59岁,[53 - 65]对64岁,[57 - 70];P = 0.02),心电图显示右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)更多(15%对4%,P = 0.007),左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)更少(26%对47%,P = 0.005),左心室舒张末期容积更高(100 mL/m,[90 - 117]对86,[71 - 110];P = 0.011)和收缩末期容积更高(72 mL/m,[59 - 87]对61,[47 - 81],P = 0.05)。在多变量竞争风险回归分析中,RBBB(HR 2.26,95%CI 1.02 - 4.98,P = 0.043)被确定为适当ICD治疗的独立预测因素。RBBB可能有助于识别有室性心律失常高风险且需要ICD干预的NICM患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54f8/11172054/ae5472b269bd/diagnostics-14-01173-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验