Jiménez-Blanco Bravo Marta, Alonso Salinas Gonzalo Luis, Parra Esteban Carolina, Toquero Ramos Jorge, Amores Luque Miguel, Zamorano Gómez Jose Luis, García-Izquierdo Eusebio, Álvarez-García Jesús, Fernández Lozano Ignacio, Castro Urda Víctor
Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Vieno km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular en Red (CIBER-CV), Avenida Monforte de Lemos 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;14(11):1173. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111173.
The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is still unclear, and the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a major challenge. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation between 2008 and 2020 in two tertiary centers. Our main goal was to identify the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] and/or shocks) in this cohort of patients. A total of 224 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 61 patients (27.2%) required appropriate ICD therapies. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more frequently men (87% vs. 69%, = 0.006), of younger age (59 years, (53-65) vs. 64 years, (57-70); = 0.02), showed more right bundle branch blocks (RBBBs) (15% vs. 4%, = 0.007) and less left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs) (26% vs. 47%, = 0.005) in the ECG, and had higher left ventricular end-diastolic (100 mL/m, (90-117) vs. 86, (71-110); = 0.011) and systolic volumes (72 mL/m, (59-87) vs. 61, (47-81), = 0.05). In a multivariate competing-risks regression analysis, RBBB (HR 2.26, CI 95% 1.02-4.98, = 0.043) was identified as an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies. RBBBs may help to identify patients with NICM at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and requiring ICD intervention.
预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在非缺血性起源的严重收缩功能障碍患者中的益处仍不明确,识别心脏性猝死风险患者仍然是一项重大挑战。我们回顾性分析了2008年至2020年期间在两家三级中心接受预防性ICD植入的所有连续性非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NICM)患者。我们的主要目标是确定该队列患者中适当ICD治疗(抗心动过速起搏[ATP]和/或电击)的预测因素。共纳入224例患者。中位随访51个月后,61例患者(27.2%)需要适当的ICD治疗。接受适当ICD治疗的患者男性更常见(87%对69%,P = 0.006),年龄较轻(59岁,[53 - 65]对64岁,[57 - 70];P = 0.02),心电图显示右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)更多(15%对4%,P = 0.007),左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)更少(26%对47%,P = 0.005),左心室舒张末期容积更高(100 mL/m,[90 - 117]对86,[71 - 110];P = 0.011)和收缩末期容积更高(72 mL/m,[59 - 87]对61,[47 - 81],P = 0.05)。在多变量竞争风险回归分析中,RBBB(HR 2.26,95%CI 1.02 - 4.98,P = 0.043)被确定为适当ICD治疗的独立预测因素。RBBB可能有助于识别有室性心律失常高风险且需要ICD干预的NICM患者。