Javaid Zeeshan, Awan Shakeel Ahmad, Babar Muhammad, Khawaja Imran, Qamar Zia
Hematology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, GBR.
Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 May 19;16(5):e60616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60616. eCollection 2024 May.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a widespread and significant cause of morbidity and mortality on a global scale. The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to examine the impact of anticoagulant therapy on major organ hemorrhage events in patients diagnosed with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Specifically, this research compares the effects of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
This retrospective observational study examined the medical records of 46 patients who had been diagnosed with VTE and were receiving treatment with DOACs or VKAs. The documentation of patient characteristics encompassed demographic information, comorbidities, and treatment particulars. Within 30 days of hospital admission, the incidence of significant organ bleeding events, with an emphasis on gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage, was the primary outcome evaluated.
Overall, 46 patients with VTE who were treated with oral anticoagulation therapy participated in the study. Twenty-four and 22 patients were administered VKAs and DOACs, respectively. The similarity in baseline characteristics between the DOAC and VKA groups ensured that the analyses were well-matched. The examination of bleeding sites unveiled subtle variations, as the DOAC group exhibited a progressive increase in the incidence of intracranial bleeding (12, 55.5%), while the VKA group demonstrated a surge in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (12, 50%) as well. While lacking statistical significance, these observed patterns are consistent with prior research that indicates that DOACs may have a lower risk of catastrophic hemorrhage in comparison to VKAs. The overall in-hospital mortality rate for patients treated with VKA was 33.3% (n=8), while that treated with DOAC was 18.2% (n=4). These differences did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). In a similar vein, the evaluation of mortality associated with hemorrhage revealed six (25%) in the group receiving VKA and three (13.6%) in the group receiving DOAC; the P value was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
This study contributes valuable insights into bleeding outcomes associated with anticoagulant therapy for acute VTE. The nuanced differences in bleeding patterns highlight the complexity of anticoagulant selection, emphasizing the importance of considering bleeding site considerations. The comparable mortality rates support existing evidence regarding the favorable safety profile of DOACs.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是全球范围内发病率和死亡率的广泛且重要原因。这项横断面研究的主要目的是研究抗凝治疗对诊断为急性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者主要器官出血事件的影响。具体而言,本研究比较了维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的效果。
这项回顾性观察研究检查了46例诊断为VTE并接受DOAC或VKA治疗的患者的病历。患者特征记录包括人口统计学信息、合并症和治疗细节。入院30天内,主要评估的结局是重大器官出血事件的发生率,重点是胃肠道和颅内出血。
总体而言,46例接受口服抗凝治疗的VTE患者参与了研究。分别有24例和22例患者接受了VKA和DOAC治疗。DOAC组和VKA组基线特征的相似性确保了分析具有良好的匹配性。对出血部位的检查发现了细微差异,DOAC组颅内出血发生率呈逐渐上升趋势(12例,55.5%),而VKA组上消化道出血也出现激增(12例,50%)。虽然缺乏统计学意义,但这些观察到的模式与先前的研究一致,即表明与VKA相比,DOAC可能发生灾难性出血的风险较低。接受VKA治疗的患者院内总死亡率为33.3%(n = 8),而接受DOAC治疗的患者为18.2%(n = 4)。这些差异未达到统计学意义(P>0.05)。同样,对出血相关死亡率的评估显示,接受VKA治疗的组中有6例(25%),接受DOAC治疗的组中有3例(13.6%);P值无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
本研究为急性VTE抗凝治疗相关的出血结局提供了有价值的见解。出血模式的细微差异凸显了抗凝剂选择的复杂性,强调了考虑出血部位的重要性。可比的死亡率支持了关于DOAC良好安全性的现有证据。