Veskovski Ljupco, Jakobsson Ingvar, Andersson Per-Ola, Gustafsson Therese, Sedigh Annelie, Knut-Bojanowska Dorota, Hansson Markus, Hveding Blimark Cecilie, Mellqvist Ulf-Henrik
Department of Research Education and Innovation and Department of Medicine (Hematology Unit) Södra Älvsborg Hospital (SÄS) Borås Region Västra Götaland (VGR) Boras Sweden.
Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry SÄS Borås and Department of Clinical Chemistry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Goteborg Sweden.
EJHaem. 2024 Apr 9;5(3):455-461. doi: 10.1002/jha2.886. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease, that at times poses diagnostic and monitoring challenges. Over the last decades laboratory methods have been expanded with serum free light chain (FLC) analysis. Alerted by two index cases with clinical impact due to failure of the FLC analysis to indicate a disease progression, we aimed to identify any clinical consequences due to known differences between FLC analysis methods. We applied two FLC analysis methods (Freelite Binding Site [FBS] and N-Latex Siemens [NLS]) on all patients with MM and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance diagnosed/followed up at Södra Älvsborg Hematology Unit, from April to December 2022. From a total of 123 patients with malignant plasma cell disorder, we identified five cases (4.1%) where solely the FBS method, as opposed to NLS, urine and serum electrophoresis, could support diagnosis or detect progression. The consequences of this discrepancy included not only change of diagnosis or delayed therapy but also change of treatment. Our findings indicate that a stronger awareness of the potential weaknesses of different FLC methods is needed, which calls for a closer collaboration between clinical chemists and hematologists.
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种有时会给诊断和监测带来挑战的疾病。在过去几十年里,实验室方法随着血清游离轻链(FLC)分析而得到扩展。由于FLC分析未能显示疾病进展而导致两例具有临床影响的索引病例给我们敲响了警钟,我们旨在确定由于FLC分析方法之间已知差异而产生的任何临床后果。我们对2022年4月至12月在南艾尔夫斯堡血液科诊断/随访的所有MM患者和意义未明的单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者应用了两种FLC分析方法(Freelite结合位点[FBS]和N-乳胶西门子[NLS])。在总共123例恶性浆细胞疾病患者中,我们发现有5例(4.1%)仅FBS方法(与NLS、尿液和血清电泳相反)能够支持诊断或检测疾病进展。这种差异的后果不仅包括诊断改变或治疗延迟,还包括治疗方案的改变。我们的研究结果表明,需要更强地意识到不同FLC方法的潜在弱点,这需要临床化学家和血液学家之间更密切的合作。