Suppr超能文献

胫骨髁间隆起撕脱骨折的手术治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Surgical management of tibial eminence avulsion fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Si Heng Sharon Tan, Fadzil Kamarudin, Andrew Kean Seng Lim, James Hoipo Hui

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System (NUHS), 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jul;144(7):3153-3159. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05318-1. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The ideal surgical management for tibial eminence avulsion fractures remains controversial with varying approach, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes reported throughout literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare between the different approaches, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes for tibial eminence fractures.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. The keywords used were "anterior cruciate ligament", "tibial spine" or "tibial eminence" and "fracture" or "avulsion". All original human studies that reported the surgical outcomes of tibial eminence fractures were included. Individual patient data meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

48 studies with 1367 patients were included. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly greater stability in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.018) and Lachman's test (p = 0.042), as compared to open fixation, though there was no significant difference for pivot shift test. There was no significant difference identified in functional scores and activity, including Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score, Tegner score and return to sports. Suture fixation had significantly increased stability compared to screw fixation, in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.001) and Lachman's test (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for pivot shift test. Significantly better subjective scores and return to activity were also noted for suture fixation, in terms of Lysholm score (p = 0.008), IKDC subjective score (p = 0.001) and Tegner score (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for return to sports.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic and suture fixation had significantly superior outcomes when compared to open and screw fixation. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee as compared to open fixation, though no significant difference was identified in terms of functional knee scores and return to activity. Suture fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee and functional knee screws as compared to screw fixation.

摘要

目的

胫骨髁间隆起撕脱骨折的理想手术治疗方案仍存在争议,文献中报道的手术入路、固定方法和术后康复方案各不相同。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较胫骨髁间隆起骨折的不同手术入路、固定方法和术后康复方案。

方法

本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。使用PubMed、MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库进行检索。使用的关键词为“前交叉韧带”、“胫骨棘”或“胫骨髁间隆起”以及“骨折”或“撕脱”。纳入所有报告胫骨髁间隆起骨折手术结果的原始人体研究。进行个体患者数据荟萃分析。

结果

纳入48项研究,共1367例患者。与切开固定相比,关节镜下固定在前抽屉试验(p = 0.018)和拉赫曼试验(p = 0.042)方面稳定性显著更高,不过轴移试验无显著差异。在功能评分和活动方面,包括Lysholm评分、IKDC主观评分、Tegner评分和恢复运动情况,未发现显著差异。在前抽屉试验(p = 0.001)和拉赫曼试验(p = 0.001)方面,缝线固定与螺钉固定相比稳定性显著提高,不过轴移试验未发现显著差异。在Lysholm评分(p = 0.008)、IKDC主观评分(p = 0.001)和Tegner评分(p = 0.001)方面,缝线固定的主观评分和恢复活动情况也显著更好,不过恢复运动方面未发现显著差异。

结论

与切开固定和螺钉固定相比,关节镜下和缝线固定的效果显著更优。与切开固定相比,关节镜下固定使膝关节稳定性显著提高,不过在膝关节功能评分和恢复活动方面未发现显著差异。与螺钉固定相比,缝线固定使膝关节稳定性和膝关节功能评分显著提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验