University Delta, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
University Facsete, Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil.
J Sport Rehabil. 2024 Jun 19;33(5):307-316. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2024-0009. Print 2024 Jul 1.
Tendon injuries are common disorders in both workers and athletes, potentially impacting performance in both conditions. This is why the search for effective treatments is continuing.
OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to analyze whether the ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis technique may be considered a procedure to reduce pain caused by tendinosis.
The search strategy included the PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, SciELO, and ScienceDirect up to the date of February 25, 2024. Randomized clinical trials that assessed pain caused by tendinosis using the Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale were included. The studies were evaluated for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and the evidence strength was assessed by the GRADEpro GDT.
Out of the 534 studies found, 8 were included in the review. A random-effects meta-analysis and standardized mean differences (SMD) were conducted. The ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis proved to be effective in reducing pain caused by tendinosis in the overall outcome (SMD = -0.97; 95% CI, -1.26 to -0.68; I2 = 58%; low certainty of evidence) and in the short-term (SMD = -0.83, 95% CI, -1.29 to -0.38; I2 = 65%; low certainty of evidence), midterm (SMD = -1.28; 95% CI, -1.65 to -0.91; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), and long-term (SMD = -0.94; 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.26; I2 = 71%; low certainty of evidence) subgroups.
CONCLUSION(S): The application of the ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis technique for reducing pain caused by tendinosis appears to be effective. However, due to the heterogeneity found (partially explained), more studies are needed to define the appropriate dosimetry, specific populations that may benefit more from the technique, and possible adverse events.
肌腱损伤在工人和运动员中都很常见,可能会影响两种情况下的表现。这就是为什么人们一直在寻找有效的治疗方法。
本研究的目的是分析超声引导经皮针刺电解技术是否可被视为一种减轻肌腱病引起的疼痛的方法。
检索策略包括 PubMed、SCOPUS、CINAHL、Physiotherapy Evidence Database、SciELO 和 ScienceDirect,检索时间截至 2024 年 2 月 25 日。纳入使用视觉模拟评分和数字评分量表评估肌腱病引起的疼痛的随机临床试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险 2 对研究进行质量评估,并使用 GRADEpro GDT 评估证据强度。
在 534 项研究中,有 8 项研究被纳入综述。进行了随机效应荟萃分析和标准化均数差(SMD)分析。超声引导经皮针刺电解术在总体结果(SMD=-0.97;95%CI,-1.26 至-0.68;I2=58%;低确定性证据)和短期(SMD=-0.83,95%CI,-1.29 至-0.38;I2=65%;低确定性证据)、中期(SMD=-1.28;95%CI,-1.65 至-0.91;I2=0%;中确定性证据)和长期(SMD=-0.94;95%CI,-1.62 至-0.26;I2=71%;低确定性证据)亚组中均被证明能有效减轻肌腱病引起的疼痛。
超声引导经皮针刺电解技术用于减轻肌腱病引起的疼痛似乎是有效的。然而,由于发现存在异质性(部分解释),需要更多的研究来确定适当的剂量、可能从该技术中获益更多的特定人群以及可能的不良反应。