Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of NPC Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ. 2024 Jun 19;385:e077890. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077890.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (nab-TPC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin as an alternative first line treatment option for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Phase 3, open label, multicentre, randomised trial.
Four hospitals located in China between September 2019 and August 2022.
Adults (≥18 years) with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either nab-paclitaxel (200 g/m on day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m on day 1), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m twice on days 1-14) or gemcitabine (1 g/m on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m on day 1).
Progression-free survival was evaluated by the independent review committee as the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.
The median follow-up was 15.8 months in the prespecified interim analysis (31 October 2022). As assessed by the independent review committee, the median progression-free survival was 11.3 (95% confidence interval 9.7 to 12.9) months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 7.7 (6.5 to 9.0) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort. The hazard ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.73; P=0.002). The objective response rate in the nab-TPC cohort was 83% (34/41) versus 63% (25/40) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.05), and the duration of response was 10.8 months in the nab-TPC cohort compared with 6.9 months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort (P=0.009). Treatment related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including leukopenia (4/41 (10%) 13/40 (33%); P=0.02), neutropenia (6/41 (15%) 16/40 (40%); P=0.01), and anaemia (1/41 (2%) 8/40 (20%); P=0.01), were higher in the gemcitabine and cisplatin cohort than in the nab-TPC cohort. No deaths related to treatment occurred in either treatment group. Survival and long term toxicity are still being evaluated with longer follow-up.
The nab-TPC regimen showed a superior antitumoural efficacy and favourable safety profile compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nab-TPC should be considered the standard first line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits for overall survival.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900027112.
比较 nab-紫杉醇、顺铂和卡培他滨(nab-TPC)与吉西他滨和顺铂作为复发性或转移性鼻咽癌的一线替代治疗选择的有效性和安全性。
3 期、开放标签、多中心、随机试验。
2019 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月期间中国的 4 家医院。
复发性或转移性鼻咽癌的成人(≥18 岁)。
患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配接受 nab-紫杉醇(第 1 天 200 g/m)、顺铂(第 1 天 60 mg/m)和卡培他滨(第 1-14 天每天 2 次 1000 mg/m)或吉西他滨(第 1 和 8 天 1 g/m)和顺铂(第 1 天 80 mg/m)治疗。
无进展生存期由独立审查委员会作为意向治疗人群的主要终点进行评估。
在预定的中期分析(2022 年 10 月 31 日)时,中位随访时间为 15.8 个月。根据独立审查委员会评估,nab-TPC 组的中位无进展生存期为 11.3 个月(95%置信区间 9.7 至 12.9),而吉西他滨和顺铂组为 7.7 个月(6.5 至 9.0)。风险比为 0.43(95%置信区间 0.25 至 0.73;P=0.002)。nab-TPC 组的客观缓解率为 83%(34/41),而吉西他滨和顺铂组为 63%(25/40)(P=0.05),nab-TPC 组的缓解持续时间为 10.8 个月,而吉西他滨和顺铂组为 6.9 个月(P=0.009)。nab-TPC 组的治疗相关 3 级或 4 级不良事件,包括白细胞减少症(4/41(10%)比 13/40(33%);P=0.02)、中性粒细胞减少症(6/41(15%)比 16/40(40%);P=0.01)和贫血症(1/41(2%)比 8/40(20%);P=0.01),高于吉西他滨和顺铂组。两组均无与治疗相关的死亡事件。随着随访时间的延长,生存和长期毒性仍在评估中。
与吉西他滨和顺铂相比,nab-TPC 方案在复发性或转移性鼻咽癌中显示出更好的抗肿瘤疗效和良好的安全性。nab-TPC 应被视为复发性或转移性鼻咽癌的标准一线治疗。需要更长时间的随访来确认对总生存期的益处。
中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR1900027112。