Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Graduate Medical Education, Bronx, New York.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Urol Pract. 2024 Jul;11(4):746-751. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000570. Epub 2024 May 6.
Gabapentin has been used in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for pain control for patients undergoing ambulatory uro-oncologic surgery; however, it may cause undesirable side effects. We studied the causal association between gabapentin and rapidity of recovery and perioperative pain management after minimally invasive uro-oncologic surgery.
We identified 2397 patients ≤ 65 years undergoing prostatectomies or nephrectomies between 2018 and 2022; 131 (5.5%) did not receive gabapentin. We tested the effect of gabapentin use on time of discharge and perioperative opioid consumption, respectively, using multivariable linear regression adjusting for potential confounders including age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and surgery type.
On adjusted analysis, we found no evidence of a difference in discharge time among those who did vs did not receive gabapentin (adjusted difference 0.07 hours shorter on gabapentin; 95% CI -0.17, 0.31; = .6). There was no evidence of a difference in intraoperative opioid consumption by gabapentin receipt (adjusted difference -1.5 morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -4.2, 1.1; = .3) or probability of being in the top quartile of postoperative opioid consumption within 24 hours (adjusted difference 4.2%; 95% CI -4.8%, 13%; = .4). We saw no important differences in confounders by gabapentin receipt suggesting causal conclusions are justified.
Our confidence intervals did not include clinically meaningful benefits from gabapentin, when used with an ERAS protocol, in terms of length of stay or perioperative opioid use. These results support the omission of gabapentin from ERAS protocols for minimally invasive uro-oncologic surgeries.
加巴喷丁已被用于接受日间泌尿肿瘤手术的患者的术后康复(ERAS)方案中以控制疼痛;然而,它可能会引起不良的副作用。我们研究了加巴喷丁与微创泌尿肿瘤手术后恢复速度和围手术期疼痛管理之间的因果关系。
我们确定了 2018 年至 2022 年间 2397 名年龄≤65 岁的行前列腺切除术或肾切除术的患者;其中 131 名(5.5%)未接受加巴喷丁治疗。我们使用多变量线性回归分别测试了加巴喷丁使用对出院时间和围手术期阿片类药物使用的影响,调整了包括年龄、性别、BMI、美国麻醉医师协会评分和手术类型等潜在混杂因素。
在调整分析中,我们发现服用加巴喷丁与未服用加巴喷丁的患者在出院时间上没有差异(服用加巴喷丁的出院时间平均缩短 0.07 小时;95%CI-0.17,0.31; =.6)。服用加巴喷丁与术中阿片类药物使用量之间也没有差异(调整后的差异为-1.5 吗啡毫克当量;95%CI-4.2,1.1; =.3)或术后 24 小时内使用阿片类药物最高四分位数的概率(调整后的差异为 4.2%;95%CI-4.8%,13%; =.4)。我们发现,服用加巴喷丁的患者的混杂因素没有重要差异,这表明因果关系的结论是合理的。
当与 ERAS 方案一起使用时,加巴喷丁在住院时间或围手术期阿片类药物使用方面没有带来有临床意义的益处,我们的置信区间不包括这方面的益处。这些结果支持将加巴喷丁从微创泌尿肿瘤手术的 ERAS 方案中删除。