Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey,
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Am J Dent. 2024 Jun;37(3):115-120.
To evaluate the effect of two resin composites (with different viscosities) and the elevation amount on fracture strength and fracture behavior of molars with and without deep margin elevations (DME).
70 extracted, caries-free human molars were selected. All teeth were prepared as MOD onlay cavities with a margin 2 mm below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and buccal sides and 2 mm above the CEJ on the distal side. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the type of resin composite used in margin elevation, elevated with flowable composite (Universal Flo) or condensable composite (G-Aenial Posterior). These two groups were further subdivided into subgroups in which the elevation was 2, 3, or 4 mm, and a control group in which the non-elevated indirect restoration was directly bonded to the subgingival margin, making a total of seven groups (n= 10). After elevations, the restorations were completed using a nanoceramic CAD-CAM block (Cerasmart A3 HT) and as adhesive cement, G-Cem Link Force. Static force was applied to the restored teeth using a universal testing machine at an angle of 15° until fracture occurred. Fracture strength values were recorded, and fracture types were examined under 6x magnification. One-way ANOVA was carried out to determine the effect of DME on the fracture strength. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to investigate main and interaction effects of the material type used in the elevation and the amount of elevation made on the fracture strength (P< 0.05).
Using flowable or condensable composite as elevation material did not affect the fracture strength of CAD-CAM restorations. Flowable and condensable composites of 2, 3, or 4 mm did not significantly affect fracture strength values for either material. Specimen margins with and without elevation exhibited similar fracture strength values. The type of material used in the elevation and the amount did not affect the fracture strength of teeth.
The deep margin elevation technique for teeth with carious lesions extending subgingivally, may be useful in routine practice.
评估两种(粘度不同的)树脂复合材料和抬升量对有和无深边缘抬升(DME)磨牙的断裂强度和断裂行为的影响。
选择 70 颗提取的无龋人磨牙。所有牙齿均制备为 MOD 嵌体腔,近中和颊侧边缘在釉牙骨质界(CEJ)下方 2mm,远中侧边缘在 CEJ 上方 2mm。根据边缘抬升中使用的树脂复合材料的类型将牙齿分为两组,用流动性复合材料(通用流动)或可压缩复合材料(G-Aenial Posterior)抬升。这两组进一步分为亚组,其中抬升高度为 2、3 或 4mm,对照组为非抬升间接修复体直接粘结到龈下边缘,共 7 组(n=10)。抬升后,使用纳米陶瓷 CAD-CAM 块(Cerasmart A3 HT)和作为粘结剂的 G-Cem Link Force 完成修复。使用万能试验机以 15°的角度向修复后的牙齿施加静态力,直到发生断裂。记录断裂强度值,并在 6x 放大倍数下检查断裂类型。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)确定 DME 对断裂强度的影响。采用双因素方差分析(ANOVA)研究抬升材料的类型和抬升高度对断裂强度的主要和交互作用(P<0.05)。
使用流动性或可压缩复合材料作为抬升材料不会影响 CAD-CAM 修复体的断裂强度。2、3 或 4mm 的流动性和可压缩复合材料对两种材料的断裂强度值均无显著影响。有和无边缘抬升的标本边缘具有相似的断裂强度值。抬升中使用的材料类型和抬升高度不会影响牙齿的断裂强度。
对于有龈下龋损的牙齿,深边缘抬升技术在常规临床实践中可能是有用的。