Department of Restorative Dentistry, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry of Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry of Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
J Endod. 2024 Sep;50(9):1321-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
Curved mesial roots can be challenging for different stages of endodontic treatment. Preparation aims to enlarge, clean, and shape the root canal system, and hundreds of systems are available to carry it out. Aiming to maintain pericervical dentin, minimally invasive preparation was proposed, and with it, instruments with lower tapers emerged. This study aimed to evaluate the increase in canal volume, the centering ability of the instruments, and root canal transportation of two different rotary systems with lower tapers.
Eighteen curved mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro-CT at 3 moments: initial and after the 2 stages of endodontic preparation. The canals were prepared using TruNatomy (TN) and ProDesign Logic 2 (PDL2) instruments up to sizes 25.04 and 26.04, respectively, and after 36.03 and 35.05, respectively. The data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric tests with a significance level of 5%.
TN and PDL2 systems showed no difference regarding the increase in the volume of the canals with the first instruments, but after preparation with a diameter size of 35 or 36, there was a difference (P < .01) between the systems in the cervical and middle thirds.
Both systems shaped the mesial canals of mandibular molars while keeping low transportation and good centering ability in enlargements up to diameter size 35 or 36 with tapers of 3 or 5%.
弯曲的近中根在各个根管治疗阶段都具有挑战性。预备的目的是扩大、清洁和成形根管系统,有数百种系统可用于完成这一操作。为了保持颈缘牙本质,提出了微创预备,随之出现了锥度较低的器械。本研究旨在评估两种不同锥度较小的旋转系统在增加根管容积、器械的中心定位能力和根管偏移方面的效果。
通过 micro-CT 对 18 个下颌磨牙的弯曲近中根在 3 个时间点进行扫描:初始状态和根管预备的 2 个阶段之后。使用 TruNatomy(TN)和 ProDesign Logic 2(PDL2)器械分别预备至 25.04 和 26.04 号,然后分别预备至 36.03 和 35.05 号。使用参数和非参数检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平为 5%。
TN 和 PDL2 系统在使用第一支器械时,根管容积的增加没有差异,但在用直径为 35 或 36 的器械预备后,在颈中和中三分之一部分,系统之间存在差异(P<.01)。
两种系统都能够成形下颌磨牙的近中根管,在锥度为 3 或 5%的情况下,在直径为 35 或 36 时,维持低偏移和良好的中心定位能力。