Action Against Hunger UK, London, United Kingdom.
EPINUT Research Group, Unit of Physical Anthropology, Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00431.
Enabling community health workers (CHWs) to treat acute malnutrition improves treatment access and coverage. However, data on the cost and cost-effectiveness of this approach is limited. We aimed to cost the treatment at scale and determine the cost-effectiveness of different levels of supervision and technical support.
This economic evaluation was part of a prospective nonrandomized community intervention study in 3 districts in Mali examining the impact of different levels of CHW and health center supervision and support on treatment outcomes for children with severe acute malnutrition. Treatment admission and outcome data were extracted from the records of 120 participating health centers and 169 CHW sites. Cost data were collected from accountancy records and through key informant interviews. Results were presented as cost per child treated and cured. Modeled scenario sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine how cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness estimates change in an equal scale scenario and/or if the supervision had been done by government staff.
In the observed scenario, with an unequal number of children, the average cost per child treated was US$203.40 in Bafoulabé where a basic level of supervision and support was provided, US$279.90 in Kayes with a medium level of supervision, and US$253.9 in Kita with the highest level of supervision. Costs per child cured were US$303.90 in Bafoulabé, US$324.90 in Kayes, and US$311.80 in Kita, with overlapping uncertainty ranges.
Additional supervision has the potential to be a cost-effective strategy if supervision costs are reduced without compromising the quality of supervision. Further research should aim to better adapt the supervision model and associated tools to the context and investigate where efficiencies can be made in its delivery.
授权社区卫生工作者(CHW)治疗急性营养不良可改善治疗的可及性和覆盖面。然而,关于这种方法的成本和成本效益的数据有限。我们旨在对大规模治疗进行成本核算,并确定不同监督和技术支持水平的成本效益。
本经济评估是马里三个地区前瞻性非随机社区干预研究的一部分,该研究考察了不同水平的 CHW 和卫生中心监督和支持对严重急性营养不良儿童治疗结果的影响。从参与的 120 个卫生中心和 169 个 CHW 站点的记录中提取了治疗入院和结果数据。从会计记录和关键知情者访谈中收集了成本数据。结果以每例治疗和治愈儿童的成本表示。进行了模型情景敏感性分析,以确定在同等规模情景下成本效率和成本效益估计值如何变化,或者监督是否由政府工作人员进行。
在观察到的情景中,由于儿童人数不均,在提供基本监督和支持的巴福拉贝,每例治疗儿童的平均成本为 203.40 美元;在卡耶,中等监督水平的成本为 279.90 美元;在基塔,最高监督水平的成本为 253.9 美元。每例治愈儿童的成本分别为巴福拉贝的 303.90 美元、卡耶的 324.90 美元和基塔的 311.80 美元,不确定范围重叠。
如果监督成本降低而不影响监督质量,那么增加监督可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。进一步的研究应旨在更好地使监督模式及其相关工具适应当地情况,并调查在其提供方面可以提高效率的地方。