Suppr超能文献

评价 vonoprazan 和 tegoprazan 治疗中国医疗保健中胃食管反流病的效果:基于 EVIDEM 框架的分析。

Evaluating vonoprazan and tegoprazan for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment in Chinese Healthcare: an EVIDEM framework analysis.

机构信息

Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.

Hebei Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03297-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Chinese healthcare settings, drug selection decisions are predominantly influenced by the Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee (PTC). This study evaluates two recently introduced potassium-competitive acid blockers, vonoprazan (VPZ) and tegoprazan (TPZ), utilizing the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking (EVIDEM) framework.

METHODS

The study employed the 10th edition of EVIDEM, which includes a core model with five domains and 13 criteria. Two independent expert panels were involved: the PTC expert panel, tasked with assigning weights using a 5-point scale, defining scoring indicators, examining the evidence matrix, scoring, and decision-making; and the evidence matrix expert panel, responsible for conducting a systematic literature review, creating the evidence matrix, and evaluating the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ.

RESULTS

The analysis estimated the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ to be 0.59 and 0.54, respectively. The domain of 'economic consequences of intervention' showed the most significant variation in value contribution between the two drugs, followed by 'comparative outcomes of intervention' and 'type of benefit of intervention'.

CONCLUSION

Employing the EVIDEM framework, VPZ's value contribution was found to be marginally superior to that of TPZ. The EVIDEM framework demonstrates potential for broader application in Chinese medical institutions.

摘要

背景

在中国的医疗保健环境中,药物选择决策主要受药房和治疗委员会(PTC)的影响。本研究利用证据和价值:对决策的影响(EVIDEM)框架评估了两种最近推出的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,沃诺拉赞(VPZ)和替戈拉赞(TPZ)。

方法

该研究采用了第十版 EVIDEM,其中包括一个包含五个领域和 13 个标准的核心模型。涉及两个独立的专家小组:PTC 专家小组,负责使用 5 分制分配权重、定义评分指标、检查证据矩阵、评分和决策;以及证据矩阵专家小组,负责进行系统文献回顾、创建证据矩阵以及评估 VPZ 和 TPZ 的价值贡献。

结果

分析估计 VPZ 和 TPZ 的价值贡献分别为 0.59 和 0.54。“干预的经济后果”这一领域在两种药物之间的价值贡献方面表现出最大的差异,其次是“干预的比较结果”和“干预的受益类型”。

结论

采用 EVIDEM 框架,发现 VPZ 的价值贡献略优于 TPZ。EVIDEM 框架显示出在中国医疗机构中更广泛应用的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f789/11188247/e3f8eb6b2d20/12876_2024_3297_Figa_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验