Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行第一年 75 岁及以上成年人血糖变异性对死亡率的影响。

Effect of glucose variability on the mortality of adults aged 75 years and over during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Health, Foundation for Biosanitary Research and Innovation in Primary Care, The Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Alfonso X El Sabio University, Research Network On Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion -RICAPPS-(RICORS), General Subdirectorate of Research and Documentation, Madrid, Spain.

Subdirección General de Investigación Sanitaria, Consejería de Sanidad, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05149-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, only one study has examined the association between glucose variability (GV) and mortality in the elderly population with diabetes. GV was assessed by HbA1c, and a J-shaped curve was observed in the relationship between HbA1c thresholds and mortality. No study of GV was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdown. This study aims to evaluate whether GV is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients aged 75 years or older with and without COVID-19 who were followed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and its lockdown measures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 407,492 patients from the AGED-MADRID dataset aged 83.5 (SD 5.8) years; 63.2% were women, and 29.3% had diabetes. GV was measured by the coefficient of variation of fasting plasma glucose (CV-FPG) over 6 years of follow-up (2015-2020). The outcome measure was all-cause mortality in 2020. Four models of logistic regression were performed, from simple (age, sex) to fully adjusted, to assess the effect of CV-FPG on all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 34,925 patients died (14,999 women and 19,926 men), with an all-cause mortality rate of 822.3 per 10,000 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI), 813.7 to 822.3) (739 per 10,000; 95% CI 728.7 to 739.0 in women and 967.1 per 10,000; 95% CI 951.7 to 967.2 in men). The highest quartile of CV-FPG was significantly more common in the deceased group (40.1% vs. 23.6%; p < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model including dementia (Alzheimer's disease) and basal FPG, the odds ratio for mortality ranged from 1.88 to 2.06 in patients with T2DM and from 2.30 to 2.61 in patients with normoglycaemia, according to different sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

GV has clear implications for clinical practice, as its assessment as a risk prediction tool should be included in the routine follow-up of the elderly and in a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Electronic health records can incorporate tools that allow its calculation, and with this information, clinicians will have a broader view of the medium- and long-term prognosis of their patients.

摘要

背景

据我们所知,只有一项研究探讨了血糖变异性(GV)与老年糖尿病患者死亡率之间的关系。GV 是通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)评估的,在 HbA1c 阈值与死亡率之间观察到了一种 J 形曲线。在 COVID-19 大流行及其封锁期间,没有关于 GV 的研究。本研究旨在评估 GV 是否是 COVID-19 阳性和 COVID-19 阴性、年龄在 75 岁及以上的患者在 COVID-19 大流行及其封锁措施期间第一年随访期间全因死亡率的独立预测因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了来自 AGED-MADRID 数据集的 407492 名 83.5 岁(SD 5.8)岁的患者;63.2%为女性,29.3%患有糖尿病。GV 通过 6 年随访(2015-2020 年)期间空腹血浆葡萄糖的变异系数(CV-FPG)来测量。结局指标是 2020 年的全因死亡率。进行了四个模型的逻辑回归,从简单(年龄、性别)到完全调整,以评估 CV-FPG 对全因死亡率的影响。

结果

在随访期间,有 34925 名患者死亡(14999 名女性和 19926 名男性),全因死亡率为每 10000 人年 822.3 例(95%置信区间[CI],813.7 至 822.3)(739 例/10000 人;95%CI 728.7 至 739.0 女性和 967.1 例/10000 人;95%CI 951.7 至 967.2 男性)。CV-FPG 最高四分位数在死亡组中更为常见(40.1%比 23.6%;p<0.001)。在包括痴呆(阿尔茨海默病)和基础 FPG 的完全调整模型中,T2DM 患者的死亡比值比范围为 1.88 至 2.06,血糖正常患者的死亡比值比范围为 2.30 至 2.61,这些结果基于不同的敏感性分析。

结论

GV 对临床实践具有明确的意义,因为应将其评估作为风险预测工具纳入老年人的常规随访和综合老年评估中。电子健康记录可以纳入允许其计算的工具,有了这些信息,临床医生将对患者的中短期预后有更全面的了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/11188234/dbdb21124692/12877_2024_5149_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验