Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
VA Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Nov;84(5):538-545. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prespecified examination of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol and febuxostat administered using a treat-to-target strategy in trial participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Prespecified subcohort analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A substudy of the STOP Gout Trial in participants with CKD. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-59mL/min/1.73m at baseline.
Trial participants with CKD and gout and serum urate (SUA) concentration of≥6.8mg/dL were randomized 1:1 to receive allopurinol or febuxostat. Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) was titrated during weeks 0-24 to achieve a goal SUA of<6.0mg/dL (<5.0mg/dL with tophi) (phase 1) and maintained during weeks 25-48 (phase 2). Gout flare was assessed between weeks 49-72 (phase 3).
Gout flare between weeks 49-72 (phase 3) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included SUA goal achievement and ULT dosing at end of phase 2, and serious adverse events.
Outcomes between treatment groups were compared using logistic regression models for binary outcomes, and Poisson regression for flare rates. Multivariable models were subsequently used, adjusting for factors identified to be imbalanced by treatment arm.
CKD was present in 351 of 940 participants; 277 were assessed for the primary outcome. Fewer patients randomized to allopurinol had a flare during phase 3 (32% vs 45%; P=0.02) despite similar attainment of the SUA goal (79% vs 81%; P=0.6) by the end of phase 2. Acute kidney injury was more common in participants with stage 3 CKD randomized to allopurinol compared with febuxostat.
Limited power to assess infrequent safety events, largely male, older population.
Allopurinol and febuxostat are similarly efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of gout in people with CKD when used in a treat-to-target regimen with lower incidence of gout flares in participants randomized to allopurinol.
PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The STOP Gout Trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, comparative effectiveness trial, which found that allopurinol was noninferior to febuxostat in gout flare prevention and that both medications were similarly efficacious in reaching a serum urate goal when used as part of a treat-to-target approach. A significant proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are afflicted by gout, yet there is a lack of high-quality comparative effectiveness data comparing allopurinol and febuxostat in these patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of allopurinol and febuxostat in the subgroup of STOP Gout Trial participants with stage 3 CKD and found that allopurinol and febuxostat are similarly efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of gout in people with CKD when used in a treat-to-target regimen, with lower incidence of gout flares in participants randomized to allopurinol.
我们对使用达标治疗策略的慢性肾脏病(CKD)试验参与者进行了别嘌醇和非布司他疗效和安全性的预先设定检查。
随机对照试验的预先设定亚组分析。
在 CKD 的 STOP Gout 试验的一个亚组中。CKD 的定义为基线时估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为 30-59mL/min/1.73m。
患有 CKD 和痛风且血清尿酸(SUA)浓度≥6.8mg/dL的试验参与者被随机分为 1:1 接受别嘌醇或非布司他治疗。在 0-24 周期间调整降尿酸治疗(ULT)以达到<6.0mg/dL 的目标 SUA(有痛风石时为<5.0mg/dL)(第 1 阶段),并在第 25-48 周期间维持(第 2 阶段)。在第 49-72 周期间评估痛风发作(第 3 阶段)。
第 49-72 周的痛风发作(第 3 阶段)是主要结果。次要结果包括第 2 阶段结束时 SUA 目标的实现和 ULT 剂量,以及严重不良事件。
使用二元结果的逻辑回归模型和痛风发作率的泊松回归比较治疗组之间的结果。随后使用多变量模型,根据治疗臂不平衡的因素进行调整。
940 名参与者中有 351 名患有 CKD;277 名参与者接受了主要结局评估。尽管第 2 阶段结束时尿酸目标的达标率(分别为 79%和 81%;P=0.6)相似,但随机分配至别嘌醇的患者在第 3 阶段(32% vs 45%;P=0.02)发生痛风发作的患者更少。与非布司他相比,在接受别嘌醇治疗的 CKD 3 期患者中更常见急性肾损伤。
评估罕见安全事件的能力有限,主要是男性,年龄较大。
当使用达标治疗方案时,别嘌醇和非布司他在 CKD 患者痛风治疗中的疗效和耐受性相似,在随机分配至别嘌醇的患者中痛风发作的发生率较低。