Badri Zahra, Foroutan-Nejad Cina
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Nat Rev Chem. 2024 Jul;8(7):551-560. doi: 10.1038/s41570-024-00617-y. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
The chemistry of actinides has flourished since the late 2010s with the synthesis of new actinide complexes and clusters. On the theoretical side, a range of tools is available for the characterization of these heavy element-containing compounds, but discrepancies in the assessment of aromaticity using different tools have led to controversies. In this Perspective, we examine the origin of controversies relating to the aromaticity of metallic compounds, with a focus on actinides. The aromaticity of actinides is important, not because these molecules are numerous or have a special role in catalysis or reactivity, but because this topic pushes theories of aromaticity to their limits. Owing to its reference independence, the magnetic criterion of aromaticity has been the most popular choice for the characterization of the aromaticity of metallic compounds, including actinide compounds. Through examination of several case studies, we show why this criterion might be misleading for metallic species and explain how findings relating to actinide compounds could reshape theories of aromaticity, not just for actinides but perhaps also for well-known hydrocarbons.
自2010年代后期以来,随着新的锕系元素配合物和簇合物的合成,锕系元素化学蓬勃发展。在理论方面,有一系列工具可用于表征这些含重元素的化合物,但使用不同工具评估芳香性时存在的差异引发了争议。在这篇观点文章中,我们研究了与金属化合物芳香性相关争议的起源,重点是锕系元素。锕系元素的芳香性很重要,并非因为这些分子数量众多,或者在催化或反应性方面具有特殊作用,而是因为这个话题将芳香性理论推向了极限。由于其与参考标准无关,芳香性的磁性标准一直是表征包括锕系元素化合物在内的金属化合物芳香性的最受欢迎选择。通过对几个案例研究的考察,我们展示了为什么这个标准可能会对金属物种产生误导,并解释了与锕系元素化合物相关的发现如何能够重塑芳香性理论,不仅适用于锕系元素,或许也适用于著名的碳氢化合物。