Reynolds H Y
Antibiot Chemother (1971). 1985;36:74-87.
Phagocytic defense in the normal lung is shared principally by two kinds of cells - alveolar macrophages that reside on the air surface and roam the alveoli and PMNs that circulate in the intravascular space or are stored transiently in areas adjacent to the capillary-alveolar interface (marginated in capillaries) and can reach the alveolar space quickly. The nature of the stimulating microorganism or aerosol particle reaching the alveolar surface may determine which phagocytic cell ultimately responds to contain the intruder. Ingestion and containment (either intracellular killing or enzymatic degradation) are the goals, and an 'opsonin' may be necessary to enhance the efficiency of phagocytosis. In the lung this is very complex, reflecting the interdependence on immune and nonimmune opsonins. For immune mediated phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages, IgG antibody is preferable. Among the four subclasses of IgG, certain ones seem to bind preferentially to macrophages, whereas others are already adherent to the cells as cytophilic antibody. In the respiratory tract milieu of subjects with CF, the interaction of immune and nonimmune opsonins is much more complex because of proteolytic enzymes that can degrade antibodies creating various fragments. Now that we are in an era of very specific humoral replacement therapy with intravenous IgG that contains IgG subclasses and the potential for using monoclonal antibodies for very precisely directed replacement, special attention must be given to identifying the appropriate class and subclass of antibody that may be required. This may be relatively simple when forms of passive immune therapy are being considered. More difficult will be devising ways to actively immunize patients (or animals) and manipulate their antibody responses so that selective immunoglobulin subclasses are produced. To obtain such control over the humoral immune response will require much more basic work in animal models. More attention to the form of immunizing antigen, type of adjuvant and site of administration will be required. Finally, selective immunization of the mucosal surfaces of the airways will present different challenges than parenteral methods that elicit systemic responses and may not be satisfactory to prevent certain respiratory infections. The prospects are exciting despite much work in cellular immunology that remains for the future.
正常肺脏中的吞噬防御主要由两种细胞共同承担——驻留在气表面并在肺泡中游走的肺泡巨噬细胞,以及在血管内循环或暂时储存在毛细血管-肺泡界面附近区域(在毛细血管中边缘化)并能迅速到达肺泡腔的中性粒细胞。到达肺泡表面的刺激性微生物或气溶胶颗粒的性质可能决定最终哪种吞噬细胞做出反应以遏制入侵者。摄取和遏制(细胞内杀伤或酶降解)是目标,而“调理素”可能是提高吞噬效率所必需的。在肺中,这非常复杂,反映了对免疫和非免疫调理素的相互依赖。对于肺泡巨噬细胞介导的免疫吞噬作用,IgG抗体是首选。在IgG的四个亚类中,某些亚类似乎优先与巨噬细胞结合,而其他亚类则作为亲细胞抗体已经附着在细胞上。在患有囊性纤维化(CF)的受试者的呼吸道环境中,由于蛋白水解酶可降解抗体产生各种片段,免疫和非免疫调理素的相互作用要复杂得多。既然我们正处于使用含有IgG亚类的静脉注射IgG进行非常特异性的体液替代疗法以及使用单克隆抗体进行非常精确的定向替代的时代,就必须特别注意确定可能需要的合适抗体类别和亚类。在考虑被动免疫治疗形式时,这可能相对简单。更困难的将是设计方法来主动免疫患者(或动物)并操纵他们的抗体反应,以便产生选择性免疫球蛋白亚类。要对体液免疫反应进行如此控制,将需要在动物模型中开展更多基础工作。需要更多关注免疫抗原的形式、佐剂类型和给药部位。最后,气道黏膜表面的选择性免疫将带来与引发全身反应且可能无法令人满意地预防某些呼吸道感染的肠胃外方法不同的挑战。尽管细胞免疫学仍有许多未来的工作要做,但前景令人兴奋。