Stirling House, The Whiteley Clinic, Surrey, UK.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Oct;58(7):733-741. doi: 10.1177/15385744241264312. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
To identify the effects of patient risk factors and pelvic venous reflux (PVR) patterns on treatment outcomes of Pelvic Vein Embolisation (PVE) for Pelvic Venous Disorder (PeVD).
We performed a retrospective cohort review assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) for women undergoing PVE for PVR January 2017-January 2021. We identified 190 patients who had completed both questionnaires and who had given consent for their information to be used for research (Median age 46, IQR 40-52). The distribution of pathological pelvic venous reflux found on transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVDUS) was analysed for all patients. Pre- and post-procedure symptom burden scores were studied using a standardised questionnaire protocol. We used inferential univariate non-parametric statistics to describe our data.
190 cases were reviewed; 62.6% (119/190) premenopausal, 11.1% (21/190) perimenopausal, 25.3% (48/190) postmenopausal and menopausal status not documented 1% (2/190). 10.1% (19/188) were nulliparous (average age 34 years; range 20-55 years). There was a statistically significant improvement in all symptoms and in the appearance of varicosities on TVDUS post-PVE ( < 0.05) of the ovarian vein plexus, uterus plexus, arcuate veins, vaginal wall, peri-urethral, peri-anal, haemorrhoids, labial and proximal thigh. The locations of veins requiring embolisation having demonstrated reflux were analysed; 82.8% (154/186) underwent embolisation of at least one internal iliac vein tributary and ovarian vein embolisation. Age, parity, menopausal status and previous laparoscopy did not affect symptom improvement ( > 0.05). No significant complications such as coil migration were observed.
PVE is an effective treatment for pelvic pain due to PeVD and its diagnosis should not be limited to multiparous women of childbearing age, as a significant proportion of patients who benefited from PVE were either nulliparous and/or postmenopausal.
确定患者风险因素和盆腔静脉反流(PVR)模式对盆腔静脉栓塞(PVE)治疗盆腔静脉疾病(PeVD)的疗效的影响。
我们对 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间接受 PVE 治疗的 PVR 患者进行了回顾性队列研究,评估了人群、干预、比较和结局(PICO)。我们共纳入了 190 名完成问卷调查并同意将其信息用于研究的患者(中位年龄 46 岁,IQR 40-52)。分析了所有患者经阴道双功超声(TVDUS)发现的病理性盆腔静脉反流分布情况。采用标准问卷方案研究了术前和术后症状负担评分。我们使用推论性非参数单变量统计来描述我们的数据。
共回顾了 190 例病例;62.6%(119/190)为绝经前,11.1%(21/190)为围绝经期,25.3%(48/190)为绝经后,1%(2/190)的绝经状态不详。10.1%(19/188)为未产妇(平均年龄 34 岁;范围 20-55 岁)。与 PVE 前相比,卵巢静脉丛、子宫丛、弓形静脉、阴道壁、尿道周围、肛门周围、痔、阴唇和大腿近端的所有症状和静脉曲张外观均有统计学意义的改善(<0.05)。分析需要栓塞的静脉位置;82.8%(154/186)至少进行了一支髂内静脉属支和卵巢静脉栓塞。年龄、产次、绝经状态和既往腹腔镜检查对症状改善无影响(>0.05)。未观察到明显的并发症,如线圈迁移。
PVE 是治疗 PeVD 引起的盆腔疼痛的有效方法,其诊断不应仅限于多产的育龄妇女,因为从 PVE 中获益的患者中有相当一部分是未产妇和/或绝经后妇女。