• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于主动学习和蒙特卡罗模拟的结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.

机构信息

Senior Consultant, UNCOMN, Chatham, IL, USA.

Data Science, AI, OR, and Logistics, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):554-571. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241258224. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X241258224
PMID:38907706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325561/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the early stages through available screening tests increases the patient's survival chances. Multimodal screening policies can benefit patients by providing more diverse screening options and balancing the risks and benefits of screening tests. We investigate the cost-effectiveness of a wide variety of multimodal CRC screening policies.

METHODS

We developed a Monte Carlo simulation framework to model CRC dynamics. We proposed an innovative calibration process using machine learning models to estimate age- and size-specific adenomatous polyps' progression and regression rates. The proposed approach significantly expedites the model parameter space search.

RESULTS

Two multimodal proposed policies (i.e., 1] colonoscopy at 50 y and fecal occult blood test annually between 60 and 75 y and 2] colonoscopy at 50 and 60 y and fecal immunochemical test annually between 70 and 75 y) are identified as efficient frontier policies. Both policies are cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $50,000. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity of results to a change in screening test costs as well as adherence behavior. The sensitivity analysis results suggest that the proposed policies are mostly robust to the considered changes in screening test costs, as there is a significant overlap between the efficient frontier policies of the baseline and the sensitivity analysis cases. However, the efficient frontier policies were more sensitive to changes in adherence behavior.

CONCLUSION

Generally, combining stool-based tests with visual tests will benefit patients with higher life expectancy and a lower expected cost compared with unimodal screening policies. Colonoscopy at younger ages (when the colonoscopy complication risk is lower) and stool-based tests at older ages are shown to be more effective.

HIGHLIGHTS

We propose a detailed Markov model to capture the colorectal cancer (CRC) dynamics. The proposed Markov model presents the detailed dynamics of adenomas progression to CRC.We use more than 44,000 colonoscopy reports and available data in the literature to calibrate the proposed Markov model using an innovative approach that leverages machine learning models to expedite the calibration process.We investigate the cost-effectiveness of a wide variety of multimodal CRC screening policies and compare their performances with the current in-practice policies.

摘要

简介

通过现有的筛查测试在早期发现结直肠癌 (CRC) 可以提高患者的生存机会。多模式筛查策略可以通过提供更多样化的筛查选择,并平衡筛查测试的风险和益处,使患者受益。我们研究了各种多模式 CRC 筛查策略的成本效益。

方法

我们开发了一个蒙特卡罗模拟框架来模拟 CRC 动态。我们提出了一种创新的校准过程,使用机器学习模型来估计年龄和大小特异性腺瘤的进展和消退率。所提出的方法大大加快了模型参数空间搜索。

结果

两种多模式建议政策(即 1] 结肠镜检查在 50 岁,60 至 75 岁期间每年进行粪便潜血试验,2] 结肠镜检查在 50 岁和 60 岁,70 至 75 岁期间每年进行粪便免疫化学试验)被确定为有效边界政策。这两种政策在支付意愿为 50,000 美元时都具有成本效益。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果对筛查测试成本变化以及依从性行为的敏感性。敏感性分析结果表明,所提出的政策对筛查测试成本变化具有较强的稳健性,因为在基线和敏感性分析情况下的有效边界政策之间存在显著重叠。然而,有效边界政策对依从性行为的变化更为敏感。

结论

一般来说,与单模式筛查策略相比,将基于粪便的测试与视觉测试相结合将使具有更高预期寿命和更低预期成本的患者受益。在年轻时(当结肠镜检查并发症风险较低时)进行结肠镜检查,并在老年时进行基于粪便的测试,被证明更为有效。

重点

我们提出了一种详细的马尔可夫模型来捕获结直肠癌 (CRC) 的动态。所提出的马尔可夫模型呈现了腺瘤进展为 CRC 的详细动态。我们使用 44000 多份结肠镜检查报告和文献中可用的数据,使用创新方法利用机器学习模型来加速校准过程,对所提出的马尔可夫模型进行校准。我们研究了各种多模式 CRC 筛查策略的成本效益,并将其与当前实践中的策略进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.基于主动学习和蒙特卡罗模拟的结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):554-571. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241258224. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测筛查结直肠肿瘤的有效性和成本效益比较。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Sep;151(3):427-439.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测联合或不联合息肉切除术后监测结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):544-554. doi: 10.7326/M16-2891. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of single colonoscopy versus single fecal test for colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment.结肠镜单一检查与粪便检测单一检查在结直肠癌诊断和治疗中的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jul;39(7):1328-1335. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16509. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and risk score.结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查、粪便免疫化学试验和风险评分的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;35(9):1555-1561. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15033. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Development of new non-invasive tests for colorectal cancer screening: the relevance of information on adenoma detection.用于结直肠癌筛查的新型非侵入性检测方法的开发:腺瘤检测信息的相关性
Int J Cancer. 2015 Jun 15;136(12):2864-74. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29343. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.商业保险与医疗保险下结直肠癌筛查的效果和成本效益对比。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1836-1847. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0106-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
9
Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查和粪便免疫化学检测的优化使用:一项使用日本数据的成本效益分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;46(2):116-25. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv186. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With Blood-Based Biomarkers (Liquid Biopsy) vs Fecal Tests or Colonoscopy.基于血液生物标志物(液体活检)的结直肠癌筛查与粪便检测或结肠镜检查的比较有效性和成本效益。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jul;167(2):378-391. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review on Calibration Methods for Cancer Simulation Models.癌症模拟模型校准方法的范围综述
Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug 11:272989X251353211. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251353211.
2
Machine learning in colorectal polyp surveillance: A paradigm shift in post-endoscopic mucosal resection follow-up.机器学习在结直肠息肉监测中的应用:内镜下黏膜切除术后随访的范式转变
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 21;31(19):106628. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i19.106628.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer and related costs in North Carolina: A population-level simulation analysis.评估保险扩张对北卡罗来纳州结直肠癌及其相关费用的影响:基于人群的模拟分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105847. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105847. Epub 2019 Oct 27.
2
Patterns of participation over four rounds of annual fecal immunochemical test-based screening for colorectal cancer: what predicts rescreening?四轮基于粪便免疫化学检测的年度结直肠癌筛查中的参与模式:什么因素能预测再次筛查?
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4634-8.
3
CMOST: an open-source framework for the microsimulation of colorectal cancer screening strategies.CMOST:一种用于结直肠癌筛查策略微观模拟的开源框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0458-9.
4
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
5
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目的成本效益和预算影响分析。
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jul;32:72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions with Their Effects on Health Disparity Being Considered.考虑到对健康差异的影响的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;48(3):1010-9. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.279. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
7
Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models.利用主动学习加速仿真模型中的校准
Med Decis Making. 2016 Jul;36(5):581-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15611359. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益
Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. doi: 10.1177/107327481502200219.
9
Colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives.结直肠癌筛查:检测、策略和观点。
Front Public Health. 2014 Oct 27;2:210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210. eCollection 2014.
10
Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.筛查乙状结肠镜检查和筛查结肠镜检查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响:随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 9;348:g2467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2467.