Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Aug;25(8):105089. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105089. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Most quality indicators (QIs) currently used in nursing homes reflect the care delivered by the entire multidisciplinary team and are not specific for medical practitioners. International experts have proposed a set of QIs that specifically reflect the quality of medical care in nursing homes. The objective of the Delphi study described here was to compile a set of actionable QIs tailored for medical practitioners working within Dutch nursing homes. This was achieved through the evaluation of 15 existing national QIs and 35 international QIs by a panel of medical practitioners, comprising medical specialists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, who are working in Dutch nursing homes. Panelists rated each QI on (1) level of direct control by medical practitioners and (2) its relevance to the quality of medical care. QIs progressing to subsequent rounds required panel agreement on both direct control (≥70% ≥3 points on a 4-point scale) and relevance (≥70% ≥8 on a 10-point scale). In the last round, each panelist selected the 5 most relevant QIs and arranged them in order of importance. These top 5 rankings were converted into points for an overall final ranking. There was consensus on 42 QIs being under the control of medical practitioners, and 21 of these QIs were considered relevant for quality of care. Most of the 21 QIs originated from the international QI set. This finding supports the transferability of the internationally developed QIs to the Dutch nursing home context and provides opportunities to compare the quality of medical care in nursing homes across countries. In the final ranking, the QI related to new medication prescriptions received the highest rating, followed by 3 QIs related to advance care planning. Future research should focus on evaluating the feasibility of measuring the selected QIs and assessing their measurement properties before implementing them in professional learning and quality improvement initiatives for medical practitioners in nursing homes.
大多数目前在养老院使用的质量指标(QIs)反映了整个多学科团队提供的护理,而不是专门针对医疗从业者的。国际专家提出了一组专门反映养老院医疗保健质量的 QIs。这里描述的 Delphi 研究的目的是为在荷兰养老院工作的医疗从业者编制一套可操作的 QIs。这是通过一组医疗从业者(包括医学专家、护士从业者和医师助理)对 15 项现有国家 QIs 和 35 项国际 QIs 进行评估来实现的。小组成员根据(1)医疗从业者的直接控制程度和(2)其与医疗保健质量的相关性,对每个 QI 进行评分。进入后续轮次的 QIs 需要小组成员在直接控制(≥70%,4 分制上得 3 分)和相关性(≥70%,10 分制上得 8 分)上达成一致。在最后一轮,每位小组成员选择了 5 项最相关的 QIs,并按重要性顺序排列。这些前 5 名排名被转换为总分的排名。有共识认为有 42 项 QIs 在医疗从业者的控制之下,其中 21 项 QIs 被认为与护理质量相关。这 21 项 QIs 中的大多数来自国际 QI 集。这一发现支持将国际上制定的 QIs 转移到荷兰养老院的背景下,并为比较各国养老院的医疗保健质量提供了机会。在最终排名中,与新药物处方相关的 QI 获得了最高评分,其次是与预先护理计划相关的 3 项 QI。未来的研究应集中评估选定的 QIs 的可测量性,并在将其纳入养老院医疗从业者的专业学习和质量改进计划之前评估其测量特性。