Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.
Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Oct;107(10):8534-8553. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24576. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
The primary objective of this cross-sectional observational study was to determine whether bulk tank milk quality, udder health, udder hygiene, and milk production outcomes were associated with facility type on organic dairies. A secondary objective was to identify other management-related risk factors associated with bulk tank milk quality, udder health, udder hygiene, and milk production on organic dairy herds in Vermont. We aimed to enroll 40 farms, to compare herds using the 2 most common systems (freestalls, tiestalls) for housing organic dairy cattle in the state with those using a bedded pack during the nongrazing season (typically November-May). Two general styles of bedded packs were observed: cultivated bedded packs and untilled deep-bedded packs. Due to the limited number of herds using bedded packs to house lactating dairy cattle in Vermont, we combined untilled and cultivated bedded packs to describe udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health on these loose-housing systems deeply bedded with organic material. The study was completed on 21 farms (5 bedded packs, 6 freestalls, 10 tiestalls) before interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data captured from DHIA records from the test closest to the date of the farm visit included average SCS, standardized 150-d milk (pounds), percentage of cows with current high SCS (SCS ≥4.0), percentage of cows with newly elevated SCS (previous SCS <4.0 to current ≥4.0), and percentage of cows with chronically elevated SCS (SCS ≥4.0 last 2 tests). Multivariable linear regression models were used to describe outcomes by facility type, but suffered from limited statistical power due to small group sample sizes. Unconditional comparisons failed to find statistically significant differences between farms grouped by facility type in metrics captured from DHIA test data, bulk tank milk somatic cell count (BTSCC) and aerobic culture data, or udder hygiene scores. A secondary analysis was conducted using univariate linear regression to identify associations between herd-management factors and outcomes for all 21 farms combined. Although not all differences found were statistically significant in this secondary analysis combining all farms, numeric differences that may be biologically important are reported showing farms with deeper bedding had a lower BTSCC, lower newly elevated SCS, lower chronically elevated SCS, lower elevated current SCS, lower average SCS, and better udder hygiene metrics. Farms with lower mean udder hygiene scores had numerically lower chronically elevated SCS, lower elevated current SCS, and lower average SCS. We could not reject the null hypothesis that milk quality and udder health outcomes did not differ by facility type, and this does not preclude the existence of biological differences in these outcomes between facility types. The current study provides insight on factors affecting bulk tank milk quality, udder health and hygiene measures on organic dairy farms in Vermont. Bedded packs may be a viable option for confinement housing during the winter nongrazing season for pasture-based herds interested in a loose-housing system in the northeastern United States, but more research, such as longitudinal studies with a larger sample size, is needed to test this hypothesis.
本横断面观察研究的主要目的是确定在有机奶牛场,奶罐牛奶质量、乳房健康、乳房卫生和产奶量是否与设施类型有关。次要目标是确定与佛蒙特州有机奶牛群的奶罐牛奶质量、乳房健康、乳房卫生和产奶量相关的其他管理相关风险因素。我们的目标是招募 40 个农场,将使用该州最常见的两种系统(自由卧床、牛床卧床)的牛群与在非放牧季节(通常为 11 月至 5 月)使用垫料包的牛群进行比较。观察到两种常见的垫料包类型:耕作垫料包和未耕作的深垫料包。由于佛蒙特州使用垫料包来饲养泌乳奶牛的牛群数量有限,我们将未耕作和耕作的垫料包结合起来,描述了这些使用有机材料深度垫料的松散式饲养系统的乳房卫生、牛奶质量和乳房健康。该研究在 21 个农场(5 个垫料包、6 个自由卧床、10 个牛床卧床)完成,之后因 COVID-19 大流行而中断。从最接近农场访问日期的 DHIA 记录中捕获的数据包括平均 SCC、标准化 150 天牛奶(磅)、当前 SCC 较高的奶牛百分比(SCC≥4.0)、新出现 SCC 较高的奶牛百分比(以前 SCC<4.0 至当前≥4.0)和慢性 SCC 较高的奶牛百分比(SCC≥4.0 最后 2 次检测)。多变量线性回归模型用于描述按设施类型划分的结果,但由于小组样本量小,统计能力有限。无条件比较未能发现按设施类型分组的农场在从 DHIA 测试数据、奶罐牛奶体细胞计数(BTSCC)和需氧培养数据中捕获的指标、或乳房卫生评分方面存在统计学上显著的差异。使用单变量线性回归对所有 21 个农场的组合进行了二次分析,以确定与畜群管理因素之间的关联。尽管在这项结合所有农场的二次分析中并非所有发现的差异都具有统计学意义,但报告了可能具有生物学重要性的数值差异,表明使用较深垫料的农场具有较低的 BTSCC、较低的新升高 SCC、较低的慢性升高 SCC、较低的当前升高 SCC、较低的平均 SCC 和更好的乳房卫生指标。具有较低平均乳房卫生评分的农场具有较低的慢性升高 SCC、较低的当前升高 SCC 和较低的平均 SCC。我们不能拒绝设施类型对牛奶质量和乳房健康结果没有差异的零假设,并且这并不排除设施类型之间这些结果存在生物学差异的可能性。本研究提供了关于影响佛蒙特州有机奶牛场奶罐牛奶质量、乳房健康和卫生措施的因素的见解。垫料包可能是对美国东北部有兴趣使用松散式饲养系统的基于牧场的牛群在冬季非放牧季节进行封闭饲养的可行选择,但需要更多研究,例如具有更大样本量的纵向研究,以检验这一假设。