Rutkūnas Vygandas, Auškalnis Liudas, Pletkus Justinas
Professor, PhD, Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105152. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105152. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
To review the developments in intraoral scanner (IOS) technologies applied in implant prosthodontics, emphasizing their influence on the accuracy of digital impressions, occlusal registrations, and the fit of implant-supported restorations.
A collection of published articles related to implant prosthodontics, the accuracy of digital impressions, occlusal registration, and the fit of implant-supported fixed restorations.
Three search engines were selected: Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane. A manual search was also conducted.
A literature search screened relevant databases and journals for studies on IOS applications in digital implant prosthodontic workflows from Dec 2018 to Dec 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized control trials, clinical trials, case series, and in vitro research focused on the use of IOS in digital implant prosthodontics.
The increased utilization of digital dental technologies has led to significant integration of digital implant prosthodontic workflows into clinicians' clinical practice. Several variables affect the accuracy of digital impressions generated by IOS. Generally, the prevailing opinion in academic papers is that digital workflows are suitable for addressing short-span implant-supported restorations. However, when it comes to long-span defects, the accuracy of digital workflows is still a matter of debate. Digital bite registration is an integral part of the workflow. It depends mainly on the defect size and location, scan strategy, anatomical tooth variations, overbite and other factors. The overall fit of digitally prefabricated implant restorations comprises of proximal, occlusal contacts and how accurately the restoration connects with implants. Research methodologies need standardization for further validation.
In clinical practice, it is essential to have a thorough and up-to-date comprehension of various factors that can affect the accuracy of digital impressions and the fit of the final prosthesis in implant prosthodontics.
回顾口腔内扫描仪(IOS)技术在种植修复学中的发展,重点关注其对数字印模准确性、咬合记录以及种植支持修复体适配性的影响。
收集与种植修复学、数字印模准确性、咬合记录以及种植支持固定修复体适配性相关的已发表文章。
选择了三个搜索引擎:Medline/PubMed、EBSCO和Cochrane。还进行了手动检索。
文献检索筛选了相关数据库和期刊,以查找2018年12月至2023年12月期间关于IOS在数字化种植修复工作流程中的应用研究。纳入标准包括随机对照试验、临床试验、病例系列以及专注于IOS在数字化种植修复学中应用的体外研究。
数字牙科技术的使用增加,已使数字化种植修复工作流程大量融入临床医生的临床实践。有几个变量会影响IOS生成的数字印模的准确性。一般来说,学术论文中的主流观点是数字工作流程适用于处理短跨度种植支持的修复体。然而,对于长跨度缺损,数字工作流程的准确性仍存在争议。数字咬合记录是工作流程的一个组成部分。它主要取决于缺损大小和位置、扫描策略、牙齿解剖变异、覆合等因素。数字化预制种植修复体的整体适配性包括邻面、咬合接触以及修复体与种植体连接的精确程度。研究方法需要标准化以进行进一步验证。
在临床实践中,全面且最新地了解各种可能影响数字印模准确性以及种植修复学中最终修复体适配性的因素至关重要。