Oral Technology, Dental School, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University, Egypt.
Oral Technology, Dental School, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105151. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105151. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
The present study aimed to evaluate the trueness and precision of monolithic zirconia crowns (MZCs) fabricated by 3D printing and milling techniques.
A premolar crown was designed after scanning a prepared typodont. Twenty MZCs were fabricated using milling and 3D-printing techniques (n = 10). All the specimens were scanned with an industrial scanner, and the scanned data were analyzed using 3D measurement software to evaluate the trueness and precision of each group. Root mean square (RMS) deviations were measured and statistically analyzed (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's, p ≤ 0.05).
The trueness of the printed MZC group (140 ± 14 μm) showed a significantly higher RMS value compared to the milled MZCs (96 ± 27 μm,p < 0.001). At the same time, the precision of the milled MZCs (61 ± 17 μm) showed a significantly higher RMS value compared to that of the printed MZCs (31 ± 5 μm,p < 0.001).
The Fabrication techniques had a significant impact on the accuracy of the MZCs. Milled MZCs showed the highest trueness, while printed MZCs showed the highest precision. All the results were within the clinically acceptable error values.
Although the trueness of the milled MZCs is higher, the manufacturing accuracy of the 3D-printed MZCs showed clinically acceptable results in terms of trueness and precision. However, additional clinical studies are recommended. Furthermore, the volumetric changes of the material should be considered.
本研究旨在评估通过 3D 打印和铣削技术制作的整体氧化锆冠(MZC)的准确性和精度。
在扫描预备的牙模型后设计了一颗前磨牙冠。使用铣削和 3D 打印技术制作了 20 个 MZC(n = 10)。所有样本均使用工业扫描仪进行扫描,然后使用 3D 测量软件分析扫描数据,以评估每组的准确性和精度。测量均方根(RMS)偏差并进行统计学分析(单向方差分析,Tukey 检验,p ≤ 0.05)。
打印 MZC 组的准确性(140 ± 14 μm)的 RMS 值明显高于铣削 MZC(96 ± 27 μm,p < 0.001)。同时,铣削 MZC 的精度(61 ± 17 μm)的 RMS 值明显高于打印 MZC(31 ± 5 μm,p < 0.001)。
制造技术对 MZC 的准确性有重大影响。铣削 MZC 显示出最高的准确性,而打印 MZC 显示出最高的精度。所有结果均在临床可接受的误差值范围内。
虽然铣削 MZC 的准确性更高,但 3D 打印 MZC 的制造精度在准确性和精度方面表现出临床可接受的结果。然而,建议进行更多的临床研究。此外,还应考虑材料的体积变化。