Suppr超能文献

预防性网片在卵巢肿瘤剖腹手术中预防切口疝。

Prophylactic mesh to prevent incisional hernia in laparotomy for ovarian tumors.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.

Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Oct 7;34(10):1596-1602. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005427.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Incisional hernias are a common complication of midline laparotomies. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of prophylactic mesh placement after midline laparotomy for ovarian tumors on the incidence of incisional hernia.

METHODS

We collected retrospective data from patients undergoing midline laparotomy for borderline or ovarian cancer with at least 12 months of follow-up, including those with and without mesh. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics and risk factors for hernia were reported and grouped according to prophylactic mesh placement. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for incisional hernia. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating the cumulative incidence of incisional hernia based on mesh placement were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 139 consecutive patients with available data were included, 58 in the non-mesh group and 81 in the mesh group, with high body mass index (BMI) as the most common reason for mesh placement. The mean (SD)) age was 60 years (13.97). A total of 11 patients (7.9%) had borderline tumors while 128 (92.1%) had invasive cancer. After clinical and radiological examination, 18.7% (26/139) of patients developed incisional hernia at a median follow-up of 35.8 months (IQR) 43.8): 31% (18/58) were detected in the non-mesh group, and 9.9% (8/81) in the mesh group (p<0.002). Multivariate analysis showed no-mesh placement (OR) 10; 95% CI) 2.8 to 35.919; p<0.001) as a significant risk factor for incisional hernia. Age ≥ 70 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.24 to 15; p=0.02) and BMI ≥ 29 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.27 to 14.93; p=0.019) were also identified as independent risk factors for hernia development. According to Kaplan-Meier curves, the cumulative incidence of incisional hernia was higher in the non-mesh group (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of incisional hernia was high in patients undergoing midline laparotomy for ovarian tumors. The addition of a prophylactic mesh may reduce this incidence, therefore there is a need to consider it as an option for high-risk patients, particularly those aged over 70 years or with a BMI ≥ 29 kg/m.

摘要

目的

切口疝是腹部正中切口的常见并发症。本研究旨在确定卵巢肿瘤患者行腹部正中切口后预防性放置补片对切口疝发生率的影响。

方法

我们收集了接受腹部正中切口治疗交界性或卵巢癌且至少有 12 个月随访的患者的回顾性数据,包括有和无补片的患者。报告患者的人口统计学资料、术前特征和疝的危险因素,并根据预防性补片放置进行分组。进行多变量分析以确定切口疝的独立危险因素。根据补片放置绘制Kaplan-Meier 曲线以说明切口疝的累积发生率。

结果

共纳入 139 例有可用数据的连续患者,其中 58 例在无补片组,81 例在补片组,最常见的补片放置原因是高 BMI。平均(SD)年龄为 60 岁(13.97)。共有 11 例(7.9%)患者为交界性肿瘤,128 例(92.1%)为浸润性癌。在临床和影像学检查后,18.7%(26/139)的患者在中位随访 35.8 个月(IQR 43.8)时发生切口疝:无补片组 31%(18/58),补片组 9.9%(8/81)(p<0.002)。多变量分析显示,无补片放置(OR)10;95%CI)2.8 至 35.919;p<0.001)是切口疝的显著危险因素。年龄≥70 岁(OR 4.3;95%CI 1.24 至 15;p=0.02)和 BMI≥29(OR 4.4;95%CI 1.27 至 14.93;p=0.019)也被确定为疝发生的独立危险因素。根据 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,无补片组的切口疝累积发生率较高(p=0.002)。

结论

接受卵巢肿瘤腹部正中切口的患者切口疝发生率较高。预防性放置补片可能会降低这种发生率,因此对于高危患者,特别是年龄超过 70 岁或 BMI≥29kg/m的患者,需要考虑将其作为一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验