Suppr超能文献

当安乐死不是最后的选择时:对加拿大公众的调查。

When medical assistance in dying is not a last resort option: survey of the Canadian public.

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 23;14(6):e087736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087736.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

What are the Canadian public's understanding of and views toward medical assistance in dying (MAID) in persons refusing recommended treatment or lacking access to standard treatment or resources?

DESIGN/SETTING: An online survey assessed knowledge of and support for Canadian MAID law, and views about four specific scenarios in a two (medical or psychiatric) by two (treatment refusal or lack of access) design.

PARTICIPANTS

A quota sample (N=2140) matched to the 2021 Canadian census by age, gender, income, education and province.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Participants' level of support for MAID in general and in the four specific scenarios.

RESULTS

Only 12.1% correctly answered ≥4 of 5 knowledge questions about the MAID law; only 19.2% knew terminal illness is not required and 20.2% knew treatment refusal is compatible with eligibility. 73.3% of participants expressed support for the MAID law in general, matching a nationally representative poll that used the same question. 40.4% of respondents supported MAID for mental illnesses. Support for MAID in the scenarios depicting refusal or lack of access to treatment ranged from 23.2% (lack of access in medical condition) to 32.0% (treatment refusal in medical illness). Older age, more education, higher income, lower religious attendance or being white was associated with greater support for MAID in general but was either negatively associated or not associated with support for MAID in the four refusal or lack of access scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Most Canadians support the current MAID law but appear unaware that MAID cases they do not support are compatible with that law. The lower support for MAID in the four scenarios cuts across sociodemographics. The gap between current policy and public opinion warrants further study. For jurisdictions debating MAID, opinion surveys may need to go beyond assessing general attitudes, and target knowledge and views regarding implications of legalisation.

摘要

目的

加拿大公众对拒绝接受推荐治疗或无法获得标准治疗或资源的人实施医疗协助自杀(MAID)的理解和看法是什么?

设计/设置:一项在线调查评估了加拿大 MAID 法律的知识和支持程度,以及在医疗或精神科(二选一)与治疗拒绝或缺乏治疗途径(二选一)的设计下,对四种特定情况的看法。

参与者

一项配额样本(N=2140)与 2021 年加拿大人口普查按年龄、性别、收入、教育程度和省份匹配。

主要结果

参与者对 MAID 的一般支持和对四个具体情况的支持。

结果

只有 12.1%的参与者正确回答了 5 个 MAID 法律知识问题中的≥4 个;只有 19.2%的人知道不需要绝症,20.2%的人知道治疗拒绝与资格相符。73.3%的参与者总体上支持 MAID 法律,与使用相同问题的全国代表性民意调查结果相匹配。40.4%的受访者支持 MAID 用于精神疾病。对描绘治疗拒绝或缺乏治疗途径的四种情况的 MAID 支持率从 23.2%(医疗状况下缺乏治疗途径)到 32.0%(医疗疾病中的治疗拒绝)不等。年龄较大、教育程度较高、收入较高、宗教信仰较少或为白人,与对 MAID 的普遍支持增加有关,但与对四种拒绝或缺乏治疗途径的 MAID 支持呈负相关或不相关。

结论

大多数加拿大人支持当前的 MAID 法律,但似乎没有意识到他们不支持的 MAID 案件与该法律相符。四种情况下 MAID 的支持率较低,跨越了社会人口统计学。现行政策与公众意见之间的差距值得进一步研究。对于正在辩论 MAID 的司法管辖区,民意调查可能需要超越评估一般态度,针对合法化的含义评估知识和意见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验