文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

脉冲电磁场治疗对慢性下腰痛疼痛和残疾的积极影响:一项对照研究。

The positive effect of pulse electromagnetic field therapy on pain and disability in chronic low back pain: a comparative study.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Türkiye.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2024 Aug;44(8):1535-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05645-x. Epub 2024 Jun 25.


DOI:10.1007/s00296-024-05645-x
PMID:38914776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11222228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain that lasts longer than three months is called chronic low back pain. Chronic low back pain is among the most common problems in the world, causing severe disability and loss of employment in patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of pulse electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) added to routine physical therapy on pain and functional status in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 69 patients with chronic low back pain. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received lumbar transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, infrared, and ultrasound treatments, and those who additionally received PEMFT. The files of patients with chronic low back pain were reviewed, and those who had been evaluated using the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) in terms of functional capacity and effects of low back pain and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain both before and after treatment were included in the study. RESULTS: No significant difference was detected between the two groups' pretreatment VAS and QBPDS scores (p > 0.05). The second-and-third measurement scores of both groups were significantly lower than their first-measurement VAS and QBPDS scores (p ˂ 0.001), but there was no significant difference between their second- and third-measurement scores (p > 0.05). According to the inter-group comparison of the VAS and QBPDS scores, the second and third-measurement scores of the PEMFT group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p ˂ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PEMFT seems to be able to alleviate pain intensity and ameliorate disability in patients with chronic low back pain. PEMFT can be considered an effective and safe option that can be added to routine physical therapy modalities for relieving chronic low back pain frequently encountered in clinical practice. Further studies validating the effectiveness of PEMFT could strengthen its position in the management of chronic low back pain.

摘要

背景:持续时间超过三个月的腰痛称为慢性腰痛。慢性腰痛是世界上最常见的问题之一,会给患者造成严重的残疾和失业。

目的:研究脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMFT)联合常规物理治疗对慢性腰痛患者疼痛和功能状态的影响。

方法:这是一项回顾性对比研究,纳入了 69 例慢性腰痛患者。患者分为两组:一组接受经皮电神经刺激、红外线和超声治疗,另一组在此基础上还接受 PEMFT 治疗。回顾性分析慢性腰痛患者的病历资料,纳入治疗前后均采用魁北克腰痛残疾量表(QBPDS)评估功能能力和腰痛影响,以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛的患者。

结果:两组治疗前 VAS 和 QBPDS 评分无显著差异(p>0.05)。两组第二次和第三次测量的评分均明显低于第一次测量的 VAS 和 QBPDS 评分(p<0.001),但第二次和第三次测量的评分之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。根据 VAS 和 QBPDS 评分的组间比较,PEMFT 组的第二次和第三次测量评分明显低于对照组(p<0.001)。

结论:PEMFT 似乎能减轻慢性腰痛患者的疼痛强度,改善其残疾程度。PEMFT 可作为一种有效且安全的选择,可添加到常规物理治疗方案中,以缓解临床实践中常见的慢性腰痛。进一步验证 PEMFT 有效性的研究可以增强其在慢性腰痛管理中的地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117a/11222228/79a249fcce1d/296_2024_5645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117a/11222228/3b426885e801/296_2024_5645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117a/11222228/79a249fcce1d/296_2024_5645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117a/11222228/3b426885e801/296_2024_5645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/117a/11222228/79a249fcce1d/296_2024_5645_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The positive effect of pulse electromagnetic field therapy on pain and disability in chronic low back pain: a comparative study.

Rheumatol Int. 2024-8

[2]
The short-term effects of balneotherapy on pain, disability and fatigue in patients with chronic low back pain treated with physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial.

Complement Ther Med. 2020-11

[3]
Subcutaneous stimulation as an additional therapy to spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of lower limb pain and/or back pain: a feasibility study.

Neuromodulation. 2011-9-21

[4]
Effect of Fixed Versus Adjusted Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Amplitude on Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain.

J Altern Complement Med. 2016-7

[5]
Subcutaneous Stimulation as an Additional Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain and Leg Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Four-Year Follow-Up.

Neuromodulation. 2015-10

[6]
Efficacy of Therapeutic Aquatic Exercise vs Physical Therapy Modalities for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-1-4

[7]
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapies in Calcaneal Spurs.

Arch Iran Med. 2023-11-1

[8]
Efficacy of the lumbar stabilization and thoracic mobilization exercise program on pain intensity and functional disability reduction in chronic low back pain patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020

[9]
A Retrospective Analysis of 25 Cases With Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and the Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection.

Neuromodulation. 2018-12-7

[10]
A comparative study between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022-11-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Investigation of the effect of different intensity stabilization exercises on core muscle stiffness and pain in chronic low back pain: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Rheumatol Int. 2025-8-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
Cluster analysis in fibromyalgia: a systematic review.

Rheumatol Int. 2024-11

[2]
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave and Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapies in Calcaneal Spurs.

Arch Iran Med. 2023-11-1

[3]
Effects of whole-body vibration therapy on pain, functionality, postural stability, and proprioception in patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025-2

[4]
Comparison of the effectiveness of conventional physical therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, functional status, and depression in patients with chronic low back pain.

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022-8-25

[5]
Chronic low back pain and its impact on physical function, mental health, and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Singapore.

Sci Rep. 2022-11-21

[6]
Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field on pain and physical function in patients with low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Rehabil. 2022-5

[7]
Low back pain.

Lancet. 2021-7-3

[8]
Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of a Bioelectronic Device in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain with Neuropathic Component. A Randomized Trial.

J Clin Med. 2021-4-20

[9]
A Prospective Comparative Study of Pulsed High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021-5

[10]
Visual Analogue Scale has higher assay sensitivity than WOMAC pain in detecting between-group differences in treatment effects: a meta-epidemiological study.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索