文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经皮神经电刺激与脉冲电磁场治疗坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛的对比研究。

A comparative study between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Physical Therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 4;101(44):e31433. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031433.


DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000031433
PMID:36343068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9646515/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized clinical study has included 56 patients (18 males and 38 females). Participants were randomly and equally assigned into 2 groups. Both groups received conventional physical therapy treatment. Moreover, group (A) has an additional TENS, and group (B) had PEMFT. Both modalities were applied once daily, 3 times a week for 20 minutes for 8 successive weeks. Visual analog scale (VAS) and carbamazepine intake (CMI) dose have been assessed before and after interventions. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in VAS and CMI post-treatment in group A and B compared with that pretreatment (P > .001). The percent decrease in VAS and CMI in group A were 72.44% and 69.47% respectively and that for group B was 68.95% and 67.94% respectively. The findings revealed a non-significant difference in VAS and CMI (P > .05) between groups. The Means of VAS and CMI were (2.4 ± 0.78, 204.5 ± 16.76 and 2.67 ± 0.9, 210.57 ± 16.5) in group A and group B respectively. The mean difference for VAS and CMI was (-0.27 and -6.07) between groups post-treatment respectively. CONCLUSION: Both TENS and PEMFT were effective and nearly equivalent in improving the post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve as measured by in VAS and CMI. Clinical recommendations should be highlighted to instigate the using of TENS and PEMFT in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.

摘要

目的:比较脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMFT)与经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效。

方法:一项双盲随机临床试验纳入了 56 名患者(18 名男性和 38 名女性)。参与者被随机平均分为两组。两组均接受常规物理治疗。此外,组(A)接受 TENS 治疗,组(B)接受 PEMFT 治疗。两种治疗方式均为每日 1 次,每周 3 次,每次 20 分钟,共 8 周。在干预前后评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)和卡马西平摄入量(CMI)。

结果:与治疗前相比,组 A 和组 B 的 VAS 和 CMI 在治疗后均显著降低(P > 0.001)。组 A 的 VAS 和 CMI 降低百分比分别为 72.44%和 69.47%,组 B 分别为 68.95%和 67.94%。组间 VAS 和 CMI 差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。组 A 和组 B 的 VAS 和 CMI 平均值分别为(2.4 ± 0.78,204.5 ± 16.76 和 2.67 ± 0.9,210.57 ± 16.5)。治疗后,组间 VAS 和 CMI 的平均差值分别为(-0.27 和-6.07)。

结论:TENS 和 PEMFT 均有效,且在 VAS 和 CMI 方面对坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛的改善效果相当。应强调临床建议,以推动 TENS 和 PEMFT 在坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛管理中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a4/9646515/10382e4cf38b/medi-101-e31433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a4/9646515/10382e4cf38b/medi-101-e31433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a4/9646515/10382e4cf38b/medi-101-e31433-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A comparative study between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022-11-4

[2]
Pregabalin and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postherpetic neuralgia treatment.

Clin J Pain. 2010-9

[3]
Short-Term Supraorbital Nerve Stimulation and Pain Relief for Acute and Subacute Ophthalmic Herpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Pain Physician. 2024-5

[4]
The positive effect of pulse electromagnetic field therapy on pain and disability in chronic low back pain: a comparative study.

Rheumatol Int. 2024-8

[5]
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as an adjunct to selected physical therapy exercise program on male patients with pudendal neuralgia: A randomized controlled trial.

Clin Rehabil. 2021-8

[6]
Prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015-5

[7]
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in combination with cobalamin injection for postherpetic neuralgia: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014-4

[8]
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): a review of applications in dermatology.

J Dermatolog Treat. 2019-8-29

[9]
Effects of visual illusion and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomised controlled cross-over trial.

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015

[10]
Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the Management of Post-Injection Sciatic Pain in a non-randomized controlled clinical trial in Nnewi, Nigeria.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018-11-26

引用本文的文献

[1]
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Prevention and Treatment of Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: A Narrative Review.

Cureus. 2024-11-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索