Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Physical Therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 4;101(44):e31433. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031433.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMFT) versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: A double-blinded randomized clinical study has included 56 patients (18 males and 38 females). Participants were randomly and equally assigned into 2 groups. Both groups received conventional physical therapy treatment. Moreover, group (A) has an additional TENS, and group (B) had PEMFT. Both modalities were applied once daily, 3 times a week for 20 minutes for 8 successive weeks. Visual analog scale (VAS) and carbamazepine intake (CMI) dose have been assessed before and after interventions. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in VAS and CMI post-treatment in group A and B compared with that pretreatment (P > .001). The percent decrease in VAS and CMI in group A were 72.44% and 69.47% respectively and that for group B was 68.95% and 67.94% respectively. The findings revealed a non-significant difference in VAS and CMI (P > .05) between groups. The Means of VAS and CMI were (2.4 ± 0.78, 204.5 ± 16.76 and 2.67 ± 0.9, 210.57 ± 16.5) in group A and group B respectively. The mean difference for VAS and CMI was (-0.27 and -6.07) between groups post-treatment respectively. CONCLUSION: Both TENS and PEMFT were effective and nearly equivalent in improving the post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve as measured by in VAS and CMI. Clinical recommendations should be highlighted to instigate the using of TENS and PEMFT in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia of the sciatic nerve.
目的:比较脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMFT)与经皮神经电刺激(TENS)治疗坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效。
方法:一项双盲随机临床试验纳入了 56 名患者(18 名男性和 38 名女性)。参与者被随机平均分为两组。两组均接受常规物理治疗。此外,组(A)接受 TENS 治疗,组(B)接受 PEMFT 治疗。两种治疗方式均为每日 1 次,每周 3 次,每次 20 分钟,共 8 周。在干预前后评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)和卡马西平摄入量(CMI)。
结果:与治疗前相比,组 A 和组 B 的 VAS 和 CMI 在治疗后均显著降低(P > 0.001)。组 A 的 VAS 和 CMI 降低百分比分别为 72.44%和 69.47%,组 B 分别为 68.95%和 67.94%。组间 VAS 和 CMI 差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。组 A 和组 B 的 VAS 和 CMI 平均值分别为(2.4 ± 0.78,204.5 ± 16.76 和 2.67 ± 0.9,210.57 ± 16.5)。治疗后,组间 VAS 和 CMI 的平均差值分别为(-0.27 和-6.07)。
结论:TENS 和 PEMFT 均有效,且在 VAS 和 CMI 方面对坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛的改善效果相当。应强调临床建议,以推动 TENS 和 PEMFT 在坐骨神经带状疱疹后神经痛管理中的应用。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015-5
J Dermatolog Treat. 2019-8-29