Suppr超能文献

机械清创术联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑与单纯机械清创术治疗慢性牙周炎的系统评价概述。

Mechanical debridement combined with amoxicillin and metronidazole compared with mechanical debridement alone for the treatment of chronic periodontitis: An overview of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Surgical Implantology, "Eugenio Espejo" Faculty of Health Sciences, UTE University, Quito, Ecuador.

Department of Epidemiology and Applied Clinical Research, "Eugenio Espejo" Faculty of Health Sciences, UTE University, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

Dent Med Probl. 2024 May-Jun;61(3):439-446. doi: 10.17219/dmp/158925.

Abstract

Periodontal mechanical debridement is the most common therapy for the treatment of periodontitis. However, depending on the severity of the disease, mechanical debridement has been recommended in combination with systemic antibiotics. In this study, we performed an overview of systematic reviews using the Friendly Summaries of Body of Evidence using Epistemonikos (FRISBEE) methodology on the effectiveness and safety of mechanical debridement combined with amoxicillin and metronidazole compared to mechanical debridement alone for the treatment of chronic periodontitis. We conducted a systematic search of the Epistemonikos database, extracted data from 10 systematic reviews and re-analyzed data from 23 primary studies to generate a summary of findings (SoF) table. We used RevMan 5.3 and GRADEpro for data analysis and data presentation. The following outcomes were analyzed: probing depth (mean difference (MD): 0.07 mm); clinical attachment level (MD: 0.04 mm); bleeding on probing (MD: 5.06%); and suppuration (MD: 0.31%). There was no evidence of a clinically relevant benefit of periodontal mechanical debridement therapy combined with amoxicillin and metronidazole compared to periodontal mechanical debridement therapy alone for the treatment of chronic periodontitis in the studied periodontal outcomes.

摘要

牙周机械清创术是治疗牙周炎最常见的方法。然而,根据疾病的严重程度,已建议将机械清创术与全身抗生素联合使用。在这项研究中,我们使用 Epistemonikos 的友好证据综述(FRISBEE)方法对系统评价进行了概述,评估了与单独使用机械清创术相比,机械清创术联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑治疗慢性牙周炎的疗效和安全性。我们对 Epistemonikos 数据库进行了系统搜索,从 10 项系统评价中提取数据,并重新分析了 23 项主要研究的数据,以生成汇总结局(SoF)表。我们使用 RevMan 5.3 和 GRADEpro 进行数据分析和数据呈现。分析了以下结局:探诊深度(均值差(MD):0.07mm);临床附着水平(MD:0.04mm);探诊出血(MD:5.06%);和溢脓(MD:0.31%)。在研究的牙周结局中,没有证据表明与单独使用牙周机械清创术相比,牙周机械清创术联合阿莫西林和甲硝唑治疗慢性牙周炎具有临床相关益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验