Suppr超能文献

未治疗的慢性牙周炎患者采用全身应用抗生素的非手术牙周治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Non-surgical periodontal therapy with systemic antibiotics in patients with untreated chronic periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Keestra J A J, Grosjean I, Coucke W, Quirynen M, Teughels W

机构信息

Department of Oral Health Sciences, Periodontology, KU Leuven & University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Periodontal Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):294-314. doi: 10.1111/jre.12221. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of different systemic antibiotics in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) when compared to SRP alone in patients with untreated chronic periodontitis.

BACKGROUND

Although chronic periodontitis is mostly treated without adjunctive systemic antibiotics, some recent meta-analyses have shown clinical benefit for some systemic antibiotics when used as an adjunct to SRP. However, there is a wide variety of systemic antibiotic regimens used today. It remains unclear if the selected type of systemic antibiotic influences the magnitude of clinical benefit.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from their earliest records through May 16, 2013. Several journals were hand searched and some authors were contacted for additional information. Outcome measures analysed were mean bleeding on probing change, mean clinical attachment level gain and mean probing pocket depth reduction. Extracted data were pooled using a random effect model. Weighted mean differences were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

The search yielded 281 abstracts. Ultimately, 95 studies were selected, describing 43 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Systemic antibiotics showed a significant (p < 0.05) additional pocket depth reduction for moderate (at 3 mo 0.27 mm ± 0.09, at 6 mo 0.23 mm ± 0.10 and at 12 mo 0.25 mm ± 0.27) and deep pockets (at 3 mo 0.62 mm ± 0.17, at 6 mo 0.58 mm ± 0.16 and at 12 mo 0.74 mm ± 0.30). Statistically, no specific type of antibiotic was superior over another. However, when analysing the clinical data for initially moderate pockets or deep pockets, some trends became apparent.

CONCLUSION

Systemic antibiotics combined with SRP offer additional clinical improvements compared to SRP alone. Although there were no statistically significant differences, there was a trend that for initially moderate and deep pockets, metronidazole or metronidazole combined with amoxicillin, resulted in clinical improvements that were more pronounced over doxycycline or azithromycin. Additionally, there was a trend that the magnitude of the clinical benefit became smaller over time (1 year).

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析的目的是评估在未经治疗的慢性牙周炎患者中,与单纯龈下刮治术和根面平整术(SRP)相比,不同全身用抗生素联合SRP的有效性。

背景

尽管慢性牙周炎大多在不使用辅助全身用抗生素的情况下进行治疗,但最近的一些荟萃分析表明,某些全身用抗生素作为SRP的辅助手段具有临床益处。然而,目前使用的全身用抗生素方案种类繁多。所选的全身用抗生素类型是否会影响临床益处的程度仍不清楚。

材料与方法

检索MEDLINE-PubMed数据库,时间范围从最早记录至2013年5月16日。手工检索了几本期刊,并联系了一些作者以获取更多信息。分析的结局指标包括探诊出血变化均值、临床附着水平增加均值和探诊深度减少均值。使用随机效应模型汇总提取的数据。计算加权平均差并评估异质性。

结果

检索得到281篇摘要。最终,选择了95项研究,其中43项研究符合纳入标准。全身用抗生素在中度(3个月时为0.27 mm±0.09,6个月时为0.23 mm±0.10,12个月时为0.25 mm±0.27)和深度牙周袋(3个月时为0.62 mm±0.17,6个月时为0.58 mm±0.16,12个月时为0.74 mm±0.30)的探诊深度减少方面显示出显著(p<0.05)的额外效果。从统计学角度来看,没有哪种特定类型的抗生素比另一种更具优势。然而,在分析最初为中度或深度牙周袋的临床数据时,一些趋势变得明显。

结论

与单纯SRP相比,全身用抗生素联合SRP可带来额外的临床改善。尽管没有统计学上的显著差异,但有一个趋势是,对于最初为中度和深度的牙周袋,甲硝唑或甲硝唑联合阿莫西林比多西环素或阿奇霉素在临床改善方面更为显著。此外,还有一个趋势是,随着时间推移(1年),临床益处的程度会变小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验