Akiyama Shintaro, Ollech Jacob E, Cohen Nathaniel A, Traboulsi Cindy, Rai Victoria, Glick Laura R, Yi Yangtian, Runde Joseph, Cohen Russell D, Olortegui Kinga B Skowron, Hurst Roger D, Umanskiy Konstantin, Shogan Benjamin D, Hyman Neil H, Rubin Michele A, Dalal Sushila R, Sakuraba Atsushi, Pekow Joel, Chang Eugene B, Rubin David T
University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2025 Jan 6;31(1):63-71. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae106.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who undergo proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may develop pouchitis. We previously proposed a novel endoscopic classification of pouchitis describing 7 phenotypes with differing outcomes. This study assessed phenotype transitions over time.
We classified pouch findings into 7 main phenotypes: (1) normal, (2) afferent limb (AL) involvement, (3) inlet (IL) involvement, (4) diffuse, (5) focal inflammation of the pouch body, (6) cuffitis, and (7) pouch-related fistulas noted more than 6 months after ileostomy takedown. Among 2 endoscopic phenotypes, the phenotype that was first identified was defined as the primary phenotype, and the phenotype observed later was defined as the subsequent phenotype.
We retrospectively reviewed 1359 pouchoscopies from 426 patients (90% preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis). The frequency of primary phenotype was 31% for AL involvement, 42% for IL involvement, 28% for diffuse inflammation, 72% for focal inflammation, 45% for cuffitis, 18% for pouch-related fistulas, and 28% for normal pouch. The most common subsequent phenotype was focal inflammation (64.8%), followed by IL involvement (38.6%), cuffitis (37.8%), AL involvement (25.6%), diffuse inflammation (23.8%), normal pouch (22.8%), and pouch-related fistulas (11.9%). Subsequent diffuse inflammation, pouch-related fistulas, and AL or IL stenoses significantly increased the pouch excision risk. Patients who achieved subsequent normal pouch were less likely to have pouch excision than those who did not (8.1% vs 15.7%; P = .15).
Pouch phenotype and the risk of pouch loss can change over time. In patients with pouch inflammation, subsequent pouch normalization is feasible and associated with favorable outcome.
接受全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者可能会发生储袋炎。我们之前提出了一种新的储袋炎内镜分类方法,描述了7种具有不同预后的表型。本研究评估了表型随时间的转变情况。
我们将储袋检查结果分为7种主要表型:(1)正常,(2)输入袢受累,(3)入口处受累,(4)弥漫性,(5)储袋体局灶性炎症,(6)袖口炎,以及(7)回肠造口关闭后6个月以上出现的与储袋相关的瘘管。在两种内镜表型中,首先识别出的表型定义为主要表型,随后观察到的表型定义为后续表型。
我们回顾性分析了426例患者的1359次储袋内镜检查(术前90%诊断为溃疡性结肠炎)。主要表型的发生率为:输入袢受累31%,入口处受累42%,弥漫性炎症28%,局灶性炎症72%,袖口炎45%,与储袋相关的瘘管18%,储袋正常28%。最常见的后续表型是局灶性炎症(64.8%),其次是入口处受累(38.6%)、袖口炎(37.8%)、输入袢受累(25.6%)、弥漫性炎症(23.8%)、储袋正常(22.8%)以及与储袋相关的瘘管(11.9%)。后续出现弥漫性炎症、与储袋相关的瘘管以及输入袢或入口处狭窄会显著增加储袋切除风险。实现储袋恢复正常的患者比未实现的患者进行储袋切除的可能性更小(分别为8.1%和15.7%;P = 0.15)。
储袋表型和储袋丢失风险会随时间变化。对于有储袋炎症的患者,后续储袋恢复正常是可行的且与良好预后相关。