Suppr超能文献

在对标准抗抑郁药反应不足的重度抑郁症患者中,依他佐辛(REL-1017)的疗效和安全性:一项 3 期随机对照试验。

Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 17;85(3):24m15265. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15265.

Abstract

To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants. In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD () were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35). For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant ( = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% ( = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% ( = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 ( = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups. The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04688164.

摘要

目的

评估依美沙酮(REL-1017)作为辅助治疗对标准抗抑郁药物治疗反应不足的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效。本 3 期、双盲、安慰剂对照试验纳入 MDD 门诊患者,随机分为每日口服依美沙酮(第 1 天 75mg,第 2 天至第 28 天每日 25mg)或安慰剂,于 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月入组。主要疗效指标为基线至第 28 天的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分的变化。意向治疗(ITT)人群包括所有随机分组的参与者。符合方案(PP)人群包括无重大方案偏离影响评估的完成者。事后分析包括重度抑郁患者(基线 MADRS 评分≥35)。ITT 分析(n=227)中,依美沙酮(n=113)和安慰剂(n=114)的平均 CFB 分别为 15.1(SD 11.3)和 12.9(SD 10.4),MD 为 2.3,无统计学意义( =.154;Cohen 效应大小[ES] = 0.21)。依美沙酮和安慰剂的缓解率分别为 22.1%和 13.2%( =.076),依美沙酮和安慰剂的应答率分别为 39.8%和 27.2%( =.044)。PP 分析(n=198)中,依美沙酮(n=101)和安慰剂(n=97)的平均 CFB 分别为 15.6(SD 11.2)和 12.5(SD 9.9),MD 为 3.1( =.051;ES=0.29)。在 ITT 人群中基线 MADRS≥35 患者的事后分析中(n=112),MD 为 6.9; =.0059;ES = 0.57,PP 人群(n=98)中 MD 为 7.9; =.0015;ES = 0.69。不良事件(AE)主要为轻度或中度和短暂的,两组之间无显著差异。主要终点未达到。依美沙酮在 PP 分析中比 ITT 分析的疗效更强,差异不是由于 AE 影响治疗依从性。在重度抑郁患者的事后分析中观察到显著疗效。依美沙酮具有良好的耐受性,与既往研究一致。临床试验注册:NCT04688164。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验