School of Pharmacy and Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroscience, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile; Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Group for Integrative Neurophysiology and Neurotechnology, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 30;134:111064. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111064. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
The impulsive choice is characterized by the preference for a small immediate reward over a bigger delayed one. The mechanisms underlying impulsive choices are linked to the activity in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and the dorsolateral striatum (DLS). While the study of functional connectivity between brain areas has been key to understanding a variety of cognitive processes, it remains unclear whether functional connectivity differentiates impulsive-control decisions.
To study the functional connectivity both between and within NAc, OFC, and DLS during a delay discounting task, we concurrently recorded local field potential in NAc, OFC, and DLS in rats. We then quantified the degree of phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), coherence, and Granger Causality between oscillatory activities in animals exhibiting either a high (HI) or low (LI) tendency for impulsive choices.
Our results showed a differential pattern of PAC during decision-making in OFC and NAc, but not in DLS. While theta-gamma PAC in OFC was associated with self-control decisions, a higher delta-gamma PAC in both OFC and NAc biased decisions toward impulsive choices in both HI and LI groups. Furthermore, during the reward event, Granger Causality analysis indicated a stronger NAc➔OFC gamma contribution in the HI group, while the LI group showed a higher OFC➔NAc gamma contribution.
The overactivity in NAc during reward in the HI group suggests that exacerbated contribution of NAcCore can lead to an overvaluation of reward that biases the behavior toward the impulsive choice.
冲动选择的特点是偏好小的即时奖励而不是大的延迟奖励。冲动选择的机制与伏隔核(NAc)、眶额皮层(OFC)和背外侧纹状体(DLS)的活动有关。虽然研究大脑区域之间的功能连接对于理解各种认知过程至关重要,但仍不清楚功能连接是否区分冲动控制决策。
为了研究在延迟折扣任务期间 NAc、OFC 和 DLS 之间和内部的功能连接,我们同时记录了大鼠 NAc、OFC 和 DLS 中的局部场电位。然后,我们量化了在表现出高(HI)或低(LI)冲动选择倾向的动物中,振荡活动之间的相位-振幅耦合(PAC)、相干性和格兰杰因果关系的程度。
我们的结果显示,在 OFC 和 NAc 中,决策时的 PAC 模式存在差异,但在 DLS 中没有。虽然 OFC 中的θ-γ PAC 与自我控制决策有关,但 OFC 和 NAc 中较高的δ-γ PAC 都使 HI 和 LI 两组的决策偏向冲动选择。此外,在奖励事件期间,格兰杰因果分析表明 HI 组中 NAc➔OFC 伽马的贡献更强,而 LI 组中 OFC➔NAc 伽马的贡献更高。
HI 组在奖励期间 NAc 的过度活动表明,NAcCore 的过度贡献会导致对奖励的高估,从而使行为偏向冲动选择。