• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性乳腺癌原发灶与复发灶生物标志物不一致性研究及其临床意义:一项来自印度的单机构研究

Study of Biomarker Discordance between Primary and Recurrent Sites and its Clinical Implications in Metastatic Breast Cancer : A Single Institutional Study from India.

作者信息

Shanthala S, Amirtham Usha, Gopal Champaka, N Suma M, Jacob Linu, Babu Govinda

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Dec 8;13(2):90-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775807. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775807
PMID:38919661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11196144/
Abstract

S. Shanthala Immunophenotypic discordance of receptors between primary and metastatic sites significantly impacts treatment outcomes. Current international guidelines recommend rebiopsy of accessible metastatic lesions to reassess tissue biomarkers. While existing literature on biomarker changes is conflicting and heterogeneous, similar studies on the Indian cohort of breast cancer patients are lacking. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the frequencies of biomarker changes between biopsies from primary and recurrent sites, and their association with various clinicopathological characteristics, including the type of metastasis and treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. This is an ambispective study performed at a single center. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of paired primary and recurrence samples of MBC patients was reviewed for the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. Concordance, loss, and gain of receptors were assessed based on the Allred scores for ER, PR, and HER2. Ki-67 was assessed based on a 14% cutoff. Further, receptor changes were studied in relation to age, menopausal status, morphology, grade, stage, metastatic sites, interval between biopsies, and treatment. At progression, biopsies were obtained from 41.18% of locoregional recurrence and 58.82% of metastatic sites. Despite high discordance of 47% for ER and 68.6% for PR, true receptor conversion was observed in 9.8%, 21.56%, and 5.88% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. There was a significant correlation between age and ER discordance (  = 0.029). Loss in PR significantly correlated with a gain in Ki-67. Of all the metastatic sites, the lung was significantly associated with PR and Ki-67 concordance (  = 0.008 and  = 0.0425, respectively). Discordance of receptors was neither related to the sites of biopsy (local recurrence or metastatic site) nor to the time interval between biopsies, prior chemotherapy, or hormone therapy. In conclusion, metastatic progression of the disease is accompanied by age-dependent discordance of ER. Unparalleled changes in PR in relation to ER suggest that ER-independent pathways may influence PR expression in MBC. Furthermore, the concurrence of PR loss with Ki-67 gain indicates an aggressive phenotype with disease progression. Hence, follow-up testing of samples for receptor expression is beneficial in determining prognosis and guiding therapeutic decisions.

摘要

S. 尚塔拉 原发性和转移部位之间受体的免疫表型不一致对治疗结果有显著影响。当前国际指南建议对可及的转移病灶进行再次活检,以重新评估组织生物标志物。虽然关于生物标志物变化的现有文献相互矛盾且参差不齐,但缺乏针对印度乳腺癌患者队列的类似研究。在此背景下,我们旨在评估原发性和复发部位活检之间生物标志物变化的频率,以及它们与各种临床病理特征的关联,包括转移类型和转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的治疗情况。这是一项在单一中心进行的前瞻性研究。回顾了MBC患者配对的原发性和复发样本的免疫组织化学(IHC)表达,以检测雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子2(HER2)和Ki-67的表达。根据ER、PR和HER2的阿尔雷德评分评估受体的一致性、缺失和增加情况。Ki-67根据14%的临界值进行评估。此外,还研究了受体变化与年龄、绝经状态、形态、分级、分期、转移部位、活检间隔时间以及治疗的关系。在疾病进展时,41.18%的局部区域复发和58.82%的转移部位进行了活检。尽管ER的不一致率高达47%,PR的不一致率高达68.6%,但ER、PR和HER2的真正受体转换率分别为9.8%、21.56%和5.88%。年龄与ER不一致之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.029)。PR的缺失与Ki-67的增加显著相关。在所有转移部位中,肺与PR和Ki-67的一致性显著相关(分别为P = 0.008和P = 0.0425)。受体的不一致既与活检部位(局部复发或转移部位)无关,也与活检间隔时间、先前的化疗或激素治疗无关。总之,疾病的转移进展伴随着与年龄相关的ER不一致。PR与ER的变化不一致表明,ER非依赖性途径可能影响MBC中PR的表达。此外,PR缺失与Ki-67增加同时出现表明疾病进展时具有侵袭性表型。因此,对样本进行受体表达的随访检测有助于确定预后并指导治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Study of Biomarker Discordance between Primary and Recurrent Sites and its Clinical Implications in Metastatic Breast Cancer : A Single Institutional Study from India.转移性乳腺癌原发灶与复发灶生物标志物不一致性研究及其临床意义:一项来自印度的单机构研究
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Dec 8;13(2):90-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775807. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
A Prospective Multi-Institutional Observational Study on ER, PR, HER2/NEU, and Ki-67 Expression and Discordance Pattern in Primary and Metastatic and Recurrent Carcinoma Breast and Its Therapeutic Implications and Prognostic Outcome.一项关于原发性、转移性和复发性乳腺癌中雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2/神经(HER2/NEU)和Ki-67表达及不一致模式的前瞻性多机构观察性研究及其治疗意义和预后结果
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;14(1):72-80. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01622-7. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Discordance in ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 Expression Between Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Lesions in Patients with Primary Early Stage Breast Cancer and the Clinical Significance: Retrospective Analysis of 75 Cases.原发性早期乳腺癌患者原发和复发性/转移性病变中 ER、PR、HER2 和 Ki-67 表达的不一致性及其临床意义:75 例回顾性分析。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Apr 9;27:599894. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.599894. eCollection 2021.
4
Retrospective analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), Ki67 changes and their clinical significance between primary breast cancer and metastatic tumors.回顾性分析原发性乳腺癌与转移瘤之间的雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)、Ki67 的变化及其临床意义。
PeerJ. 2024 May 15;12:e17377. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17377. eCollection 2024.
5
Discordances in estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and HER2 status between primary breast cancer and metastasis.原发性乳腺癌与转移灶之间的雌激素受体状态、孕激素受体状态和 HER2 状态的不一致性。
Oncologist. 2013 Jun;18(6):667-74. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0350. Epub 2013 May 30.
6
Discordance of immunohistochemical markers between primary and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of 107 cases.原发性与复发性或转移性乳腺癌之间免疫组化标志物的不一致性:107例回顾性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020738.
7
Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience.乳腺癌生物标志物检测在核心针活检和手术标本中的一致性:单机构经验。
Cancer Med. 2022 Dec;11(24):4954-4965. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4843. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
8
Biomarker Discordances and Alterations Observed in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Causes, Frequencies, and Clinical Significances.新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌中观察到的生物标志物不一致和改变:原因、频率和临床意义。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 8;29(12):9695-9710. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120761.
9
[Clinical outcome of receptor expression discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer].[原发性与转移性乳腺癌受体表达不一致的临床结局]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 23;40(7):506-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.07.005.
10
Real-world data on discordance between estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptor expression on diagnostic tumor biopsy versus tumor resection material.关于诊断性肿瘤活检与肿瘤切除组织中雌激素、孕激素和 HER2 受体表达不一致的真实世界数据。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05141-y. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term survival outcomes and subtype variations between primary breast cancer and liver metastases in 542 patients with advanced breast cancer: insights from a real-world analysis.542例晚期乳腺癌患者原发性乳腺癌与肝转移的长期生存结果及亚型差异:一项真实世界分析的见解
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 7;16(1):1493. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03342-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer in India: Present scenario and the challenges ahead.印度的乳腺癌:现状与未来挑战。
World J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 24;13(3):209-218. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i3.209.
2
Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet.原发性肿瘤与转移灶之间的表型不一致影响转移部位和预后:WSG-DETECT-PriMet研究结果
Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Oct;16(5):475-483. doi: 10.1159/000512416. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Prognostic significance of receptor expression discordance between primary and recurrent breast cancers: a meta-analysis.
原发和复发性乳腺癌中受体表达不一致的预后意义:一项荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan;191(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06390-6. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Receptor discordance and phenotype change in metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌中的受体不一致和表型改变。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Jan;44(1):192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
6
Discordance of immunohistochemical markers between primary and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of 107 cases.原发性与复发性或转移性乳腺癌之间免疫组化标志物的不一致性:107例回顾性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 19;99(25):e20738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020738.
7
The Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with different metastatic sites in stage IV breast cancer.IV 期乳腺癌不同转移部位患者的临床病理特征和生存结局。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):1091. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z.
8
Changes in Biomarker Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Their Prognostic Value.转移性乳腺癌生物标志物状态的变化及其预后价值。
J Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;22(3):439-452. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e38.
9
Evaluations of Biomarker Status Changes between Primary and Recurrent Tumor Tissue Samples in Breast Cancer Patients.评估乳腺癌患者原发和复发性肿瘤组织样本中生物标志物状态的变化。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Sep 10;2019:7391237. doi: 10.1155/2019/7391237. eCollection 2019.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 Focused Update of Breast Cancer HER2 FISH Testing GuidelinesResults From a National Reference Laboratory.美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学院 2018 年乳腺癌 HER2 FISH 检测指南重点更新:来自国家参考实验室的结果。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Sep 9;152(4):479-485. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz061.