Strand Michael W, Watanabe Jonathan H
Center for Data-Driven Drugs Research and Policy, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, 856 Health Sciences Drive Road, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jun 16;12(3):94. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12030094.
Global support and standardization of regulation for biosimilars approval owes much of its legacy to the World Health Organization (WHO), since the first guidance by the organization on the matter was released in 2009. Since then, and with over a decade of research, the 2022 revision provides opportunities for time and financial savings to pharmaceutical manufacturers aiming to prove similarity of a potential biosimilar product to some reference product, particularly by clarifying that the use of a non-local reference product as a comparator in certain studies is permissible. This declaration has important implications, particularly in the emerging biological markets of the Middle East and North Africa region, where WHO guidelines have been integral to the regulatory framework of over a dozen countries for more than a decade. This article aims to review the impact of this revision on these countries and relevant policies on non-local comparator usage. Since 2022, this revision has been adopted only in Egypt. Many North African countries are yet to adopt a first draft of the formalized guidance. This analysis revealed that, although many of these countries reference the WHO guidelines, hesitation remains in terms of sourcing comparator products outside the US or European countries. This likely translates to slow regional development and cooperation of functioning, sustainable biosimilars markets. Future studies will be necessary to evaluate the continued development of guidance within these countries and changes in comparator sourcing norms as more time is allowed for their policies to mature and adapt to new standards.
生物类似药批准的全球支持和监管标准化很大程度上归功于世界卫生组织(WHO),因为该组织于2009年发布了关于此事的首份指南。从那时起,经过十多年的研究,2022年的修订版为旨在证明潜在生物类似药产品与某些参比产品相似性的制药商提供了节省时间和资金的机会,特别是通过明确在某些研究中使用非本地参比产品作为对照是允许的。这一声明具有重要意义,尤其是在中东和北非地区新兴的生物市场,十多年来,WHO指南一直是十几个国家监管框架的一部分。本文旨在回顾这一修订版对这些国家的影响以及关于使用非本地对照品的相关政策。自2022年以来,这一修订版仅在埃及被采用。许多北非国家尚未采用正式指南的初稿。该分析表明,尽管这些国家中的许多都参考了WHO指南,但在从美国或欧洲国家以外采购对照品方面仍存在犹豫。这可能意味着该地区功能性、可持续生物类似药市场的发展和合作将放缓。未来有必要进行研究,以评估这些国家指南的持续发展以及随着时间推移其政策成熟并适应新标准,对照品采购规范的变化。