Alnaqbi Khalid A, Bellanger Agnès, Brill Alex, Castañeda-Hernández Gilberto, Clopés Estela Ana, Delgado Sánchez Olga, García-Alfonso Pilar, Gyger Pius, Heinrich Daniel, Hezard Germain, Kakehasi Adriana, Koehn Cheryl, Mariotte Olivier, Mennini Francesco, Mayra Pérez-Tapia Sonia, Pistollato Michele, Saada Rowan, Sasaki Tadanori, Tambassis George, Thill Marc, Werutsky Gustavo, Wilsdon Tim, Simoens Steven
Tawam Hospital, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1188368. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1188368. eCollection 2023.
Although biosimilar uptake has increased (at a variable pace) in many countries, there have been recent concerns about the long-term sustainability of biosimilar markets. The aim of this manuscript is to assess the sustainability of policies across the biosimilar life cycle in selected countries with a view to propose recommendations for supporting biosimilar sustainability. The study conducted a comparative analysis across 17 countries from North America, South America, Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council. Biosimilar policies were identified and their sustainability was assessed based on country-specific reviews of the scientific and grey literature, validation by industry experts and 23 international and local non-industry experts, and two advisory board meetings with these non-industry experts. Given that European countries tend to have more experience with biosimilars and more developed policy frameworks, they generally have higher sustainability scores than the other selected countries. Existing approaches to biosimilar manufacturing and R&D, policies guaranteeing safe and high-quality biosimilars, exemption from the requirement to apply health technology assessment to biosimilars, and initiatives counteracting biosimilar misconceptions are considered sustainable. However, biosimilar contracting approaches, biosimilar education and understanding can be ameliorated in all selected countries. Also, similar policies are sometimes perceived to be sustainable in some markets, but not in others. More generally, the sustainability of the biosimilar landscape depends on the nature of the healthcare system and existing pharmaceutical market access policies, the experience with biosimilar use and policies. This suggests that a general biosimilar policy toolkit that ensures sustainability does not exist, but varies from country to country. This study proposes a set of elements that should underpin sustainable biosimilar policy development over time in a country. At first, biosimilar policies should guarantee the safety and quality of biosimilars, healthy levels of supply and a level of cost savings. As a country gains experience with biosimilars, policies need to optimise uptake and combat any misconceptions about biosimilars. Finally, a country should implement biosimilar policies that foster competition, expand treatment options and ensure a sustainable market environment.
尽管生物类似药在许多国家的采用率有所提高(速度不一),但近期人们对生物类似药市场的长期可持续性表示担忧。本手稿的目的是评估选定国家生物类似药生命周期内政策的可持续性,以期提出支持生物类似药可持续性的建议。该研究对来自北美、南美、亚太、欧洲和海湾合作委员会的17个国家进行了比较分析。通过对科学文献和灰色文献的国别审查、行业专家以及23位国际和本地非行业专家的验证,以及与这些非行业专家举行的两次咨询委员会会议,确定了生物类似药政策并评估了其可持续性。鉴于欧洲国家在生物类似药方面往往有更多经验且政策框架更为完善,它们的可持续性得分通常高于其他选定国家。生物类似药的现有生产和研发方法、保证生物类似药安全和高质量的政策、生物类似药无需进行卫生技术评估的豁免规定以及消除对生物类似药误解的举措被认为是可持续的。然而,所有选定国家的生物类似药合同签订方式、生物类似药教育和认知情况都有待改善。此外,类似政策在某些市场有时被认为具有可持续性,但在其他市场则不然。更普遍地说,生物类似药格局的可持续性取决于医疗保健系统的性质和现有的药品市场准入政策、生物类似药使用经验和政策。这表明不存在确保可持续性的通用生物类似药政策工具包,而是因国家而异。本研究提出了一组要素,这些要素应随着时间的推移为一国可持续的生物类似药政策发展提供支撑。首先,生物类似药政策应保证生物类似药的安全性和质量、充足的供应水平以及一定程度的成本节约。随着一个国家积累生物类似药使用经验,政策需要优化其采用率并消除对生物类似药的任何误解。最后,一个国家应实施促进竞争、扩大治疗选择并确保可持续市场环境的生物类似药政策。