• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用下限约束优化 IMPT 中的点强度:揭示不足并引入增强策略。

Optimizing spot intensity with lower bound constraints for IMPT: Exposing shortcomings and introducing an enhanced strategy.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2024 Oct;51(10):7523-7544. doi: 10.1002/mp.17265. Epub 2024 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/mp.17265
PMID:38922975
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) is a sophisticated radiation treatment allowing for precise dose distributions. However, conventional spot selection strategies in IMPT face challenges, particularly with minimum monitor unit (MU) constraints, affecting planning quality and efficiency.

PURPOSE

This study introduces an innovative Two-Stage Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) method to optimize spot intensity in IMPT with Lower Bound (LB) constraints. This method seeks to improve treatment planning efficiency and precision, overcoming limitations of existing strategies.

METHODS

Our approach evaluates prevalent IMPT spot selection strategies, identifying their limitations, especially concerning MU constraints. We integrated LB constraints into a MILP framework, using a novel three-phase strategy for spot pool selection, to enhance performance over traditional heuristic methods and L1 + L∞ strategies. The method's efficacy was tested in eight study cases, using Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs), spot selection efficiency, and computation time analysis for benchmarking against established methods.

RESULTS

The proposed method showed superior performance in DVH quality, adhering to LB constraints while maintaining high-quality treatment plans. It outperformed existing techniques in spot selection, reducing unnecessary spots and balancing precision with efficiency. Cases studies confirmed the method's effectiveness in producing clinically feasible plans with enhanced dose distributions and reduced hotspots, especially in cases with elevated LB constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

Our Two-Stage MILP strategy signifies a significant advancement in IMPT treatment planning. By incorporating LB constraints directly into the optimization process, it achieves superior plan quality and deliverability compared to current methods. This approach is particularly advantageous in clinical settings requiring minimum spot number and high MU LB constraints, offering the potential for improved patient outcomes through more precise and efficient radiation therapy plans.

摘要

背景

强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)是一种精确的放射治疗方法,能够实现精确的剂量分布。然而,IMPT 中的传统光斑选择策略面临挑战,特别是在最小监测单位(MU)限制下,这会影响计划质量和效率。

目的

本研究引入了一种创新的两阶段混合整数线性规划(MILP)方法,通过下限(LB)约束来优化 IMPT 中的光斑强度。该方法旨在提高治疗计划的效率和精度,克服现有策略的局限性。

方法

我们的方法评估了常见的 IMPT 光斑选择策略,确定了它们的局限性,特别是在 MU 限制方面。我们将 LB 约束集成到 MILP 框架中,使用一种新颖的三阶段光斑池选择策略,以提高性能,优于传统启发式方法和 L1+L∞策略。该方法在八个研究案例中进行了测试,使用剂量-体积直方图(DVH)、光斑选择效率和计算时间分析来与现有方法进行基准测试。

结果

所提出的方法在 DVH 质量方面表现出优异的性能,在遵守 LB 约束的同时保持高质量的治疗计划。它在光斑选择方面优于现有技术,减少了不必要的光斑,并在效率和精度之间取得平衡。案例研究证实了该方法在产生具有增强剂量分布和减少热点的临床可行计划方面的有效性,特别是在 LB 约束较高的情况下。

结论

我们的两阶段 MILP 策略是 IMPT 治疗计划的重大进展。通过将 LB 约束直接纳入优化过程,与现有方法相比,它实现了更高质量和可交付性的计划。这种方法在需要最小光斑数量和高 MU LB 约束的临床环境中特别有利,通过更精确和高效的放射治疗计划,为改善患者结果提供了潜力。

相似文献

1
Optimizing spot intensity with lower bound constraints for IMPT: Exposing shortcomings and introducing an enhanced strategy.利用下限约束优化 IMPT 中的点强度:揭示不足并引入增强策略。
Med Phys. 2024 Oct;51(10):7523-7544. doi: 10.1002/mp.17265. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
2
Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning.将可交付的剂量监测单位约束条件纳入调强质子治疗计划的点强度优化中。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Aug 7;58(15):5113-25. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/15/5113. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
3
Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.调强质子治疗中具有剂量体积约束的混合整数规划
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):29-35. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12130. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
4
Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.强度调制质子治疗脑和单侧头颈部肿瘤中的综合射束方向和扫描野优化。
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1338-1350. doi: 10.1002/mp.12788. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.在调强质子治疗中基于风险价值机会约束的稳健治疗计划
Med Phys. 2017 Jan;44(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/mp.12001. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.用于调强质子治疗剂量分布的“最坏情况剂量”和“极小极大”稳健优化的线性和非线性规划方法比较
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar;18(2):15-25. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12033. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
7
Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.小光斑强度调制质子与容积调制弧形治疗技术治疗远端食管癌计划的剂量学比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jul;20(7):15-27. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12623. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.在肝部超分割放射治疗中,使用单能量质子笔形束扫描布拉格峰进行强度调制质子治疗 FLASH 治疗计划。
Med Phys. 2022 Oct;49(10):6560-6574. doi: 10.1002/mp.15894. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint.一种具有最小监测单位约束的调强质子治疗的新型快速鲁棒优化算法。
Med Phys. 2024 Sep;51(9):6220-6230. doi: 10.1002/mp.17285. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
10
An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters.基于患者特征脊滤波器的质子立体定向体放射治疗FLASH 治疗计划的一体化物理优化框架,可实现剂量、剂量率和线性能量传递优化。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jul 15;116(4):949-959. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.048. Epub 2023 Feb 1.